首页> 外文会议>Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence >Courses Select Textbooks: Comparison of Two Methods
【24h】

Courses Select Textbooks: Comparison of Two Methods

机译:课程选择教科书:两种方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Let one need to select appropriate textbooks for a given course or different parts of a course presented by their limited lists of keywords. When such a selection is based only on correspondence between the contents of textbooks and course description then the problem solution reduces to procedures of Information Retrieval. Here, the former can be considered as a database of documents and the latter as a query. In the paper we show the possibilities of two IR methods: (1) a spreading activation method (SAM) using semantic network related to textbooks, and (2) a coverage-based method (CBM) using a simple formal comparison of vocabularies. Unlike the usual applications of SAM and CBM we use: the criterion of term specificity for building the vocabulary of textbooks and the normalized measure of network activation. The experimental data includes two examples from technical and humantitarian sciences: the course of "Database Management" in the Catholic University of San Pablo in Peru, and the course of "Spanish Lexicology" in the Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain. The results of the application of both methods are compared to the manual assessments of experts. The presented research is a Pilot study.
机译:让人们需要为其有限的关键字列表提供给定课程或不同部分的适当教科书。当这样的选择仅基于教科书的内容和课程描述之间的对应关系时,问题解决方案减少了信息检索的过程。这里,前者可以被认为是文档数据库和后者作为查询。在本文中,我们示出的两个IR方法的可能性:(1)使用与教科书语义网络激活扩散方法(SAM),和(2)一个基于覆盖的方法(CBM),使用词汇的一个简单的正式比较。与SAM和CBM的通常应用程序不同,我们使用:用于构建教科书词汇的术语特异性以及网络激活标准化衡量标准。实验数据包括来自技术和humantitarian科学两个例子:“数据库管理”的圣巴勃罗在秘鲁天主教大学的过程中,和“西班牙语词汇学”的巴塞罗那在西班牙自治大学的课程。将两种方法应用的结果与专家的手动评估进行比较。本研究是一项试点研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号