首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference >Cognitive and Motivational Scaffolding First-Year Engineering Students Need When Solving Design Problems in Collaborative Teams
【24h】

Cognitive and Motivational Scaffolding First-Year Engineering Students Need When Solving Design Problems in Collaborative Teams

机译:在协作团队中解决设计问题时,认知和励志脚手架的第一年工程学生需要

获取原文

摘要

This study aims to contribute to the literature on engineering learning by examining the role of team discourse in supporting or hindering first-year engineering students' self-efficacy and achievement. Bandura's self-efficacy theory and Vygotsky's social constructivist theory were used as theoretical frameworks. Twenty-five first-year engineering students (six teams) participated in the study and their team discussions were video and audio recorded between February and May 2007. During the study, students worked on three design projects: a fire rescue project, a pharmaceutical lozenge design project, and a street-crossing problem. A three-stage sequential mixed-methods approach (qualitative → quantitative → qualitative) was used for data analysis. The first and second stages involved the coding of student talk and correlation analyses between self-efficacy, achievement, and discourse type. Results from these two phases were presented in detail in a previous paper. In summary, the analyses showed a statistically significant positive correlation between the amount of supportive comments given and the self-efficacy of the giver. There was a negative correlation between self-efficacy and engagement in disruptive behaviors. In addition, initial self-efficacy was found to be a predictor of responsive behavior. The third step of the data analysis, the focus of this paper, involved an in-depth examination of three case study students (Bryan, a support-oriented student; Eric, a response-oriented student; and Alex, a disruptive student) and their teams. Results suggest that supportive comments can improve self-efficacy and motivation and are critical for collaborative decision-making; however, a lack of analytical argumentation and skepticism can hinder cognitive processes and hurt student learning. As an implication of this study, a list of recommendations is made and an instrument is developed to help scaffold student team processes.
机译:本研究旨在通过审查团队话语在支持或妨碍第一年工程学生的自我效力和成就的作用来促进工程学习的文献。 Bandura的自我效能理论和Vygotsky的社会建构主义理论被用作理论框架。二十五个第一年的工程学生(六支队伍)参加了该研究,他们的团队讨论是2007年2月和5月之间录制的视频和音频。在研究期间,学生们在三个设计项目上工作:火灾救援项目,药物彩蛋设计项目,以及街道过境问题。三阶段顺序混合方法方法(定性→定量→定性)用于数据分析。第一阶段和第二个阶段涉及学生谈话的编码和自我效能,成就和话语类型之间的相关分析。在前一篇论文中详细介绍了这两种阶段的结果。总之,分析显示了给出的支持性评论的数量与提高者的自我效能之间存在统计学上显着的正相关性。颠覆性行为的自我效力与参与之间存在负相关性。此外,发现初始自效是响应行为的预测因素。数据分析的第三步,本文的重点,涉及对三个案例研究生的深入检查(Bryan,一个面向支持的学生;埃里克,一个以迎来的学生;和亚历克斯,一个破坏性的学生)和亚历克斯,一个破坏性的学生)和他们的团队。结果表明,支持性评论可以提高自我效能和动机,对协作决策至关重要;然而,缺乏分析论证和怀疑主义可以妨碍认知过程和伤害学生学习。作为本研究的含义,制定了一系列建议,并开发了一个乐器以帮助脚手架学生团队进程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号