首页> 外文学位 >A qualitative evaluation of teaming, problem-solving, and technology-utilization skills of students in the integrated first-year curriculum in science, engineering, and mathematics.
【24h】

A qualitative evaluation of teaming, problem-solving, and technology-utilization skills of students in the integrated first-year curriculum in science, engineering, and mathematics.

机译:对科学,工程和数学综合一年级课程中学生的团队合作,解决问题和技术利用技能的定性评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 1993, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology became a member of the Foundation Coalition, one of six Engineering Education Coalitions sponsored by grants from the National Science Foundation. Experimental curricula were created, including the Integrated First Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics (IFYCSEM) and the Sophomore Engineering Program (SEC).;In this study, students who completed one or more of the Foundation Coalition curricula were placed in four-member teams and comparatively evaluated using qualitative research techniques for their abilities to work in teams, to solve complex, open-ended problems and to utilize technology.;This study evaluated the outcomes for the students at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and provided a model and suggestions for studies of similar design. The study found that only those students who had persisted from the IFYCSEM program into the SEC exhibited the behaviors outlined by the Foundation Coalition performance criteria as necessary for meeting the goals of teaming, and problem-solving. Students who had participated only in the IFYCSEM program showed the fewest behaviors that met the performance criteria. Technology-utilization was especially notable through its minimal employment by all groups.;The summary and discussion examined the applications of this brief, focused study that took place in a unique environment to the field of educational assessment and higher educational practices. The summary confronted the issue of question design in an open-ended problem-solving study and showed the importance of working with stakeholders, in this case, faculty. The study discussed how the content area of engineering education and experiences of the faculty as engineers shaped the creation of the question used in the study so that it influenced the students' abilities to exemplify the performance criteria specified.
机译:1993年,罗斯-霍尔曼技术学院成为基金会联盟的成员,该基金会是由国家科学基金会资助的六个工程教育联盟之一。创建了实验课程,包括科学,工程和数学综合第一年课程(IFYCSEM)和二年级工程计划(SEC)。在本研究中,完成了一个或多个基础联盟课程的学生分为四个成员团队,并使用定性研究技术对他们进行团队合作,解决复杂的开放性问题和利用技术的能力进行比较评估;该研究评估了Rose-Hulman理工学院学生的学习成果,并提供了模型和类似设计研究的建议。研究发现,只有那些坚持从IFYCSEM计划进入SEC的学生才能表现出基金会联盟绩效标准所概述的行为,这对于实现团队合作和解决问题的目标是必不可少的。仅参加IFYCSEM计划的学生表现出的最低行为符合绩效标准。技术利用在所有群体中的使用量最少,因此尤其引人注目。总结和讨论考察了这一简短的,重点突出的研究的应用,该研究是在独特的环境中进行的,涉及教育评估和高等教育实践。摘要在开放式问题解决研究中遇到了问题设计的问题,并显示了与利益相关者(在这种情况下,与教师)合作的重要性。该研究讨论了工程教育的内容领域和作为工程师的教师经验如何塑造了研究中所使用问题的创造,从而影响了学生举例说明所指定绩效标准的能力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sando, Jean Kathryn Como.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana State University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana State University.;
  • 学科 Education Technology of.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.;Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 143 p.
  • 总页数 143
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:35
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号