首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Investigating Students' Performance for Textbook and in-House Homework Assignments
【24h】

Investigating Students' Performance for Textbook and in-House Homework Assignments

机译:调查学生对教科书和内部家庭作业的表现

获取原文

摘要

Homework assignments have always been an integral part of learning in all majors and disciplines. These assignments are usually selected from the textbook as these provide a variety of problems related to the topic at hand. Before the advent of internet, the solution manuals to these problems where confidential as they were in most cases hard copies mailed directly to the professor. Nowadays almost any problem in a textbook can have its solution available over the web, and many students are believed to have access. Since homework are sometimes used to assess the student learning outcomes, it is important to make sure the work presented by the students is descriptive of their understanding. The objective of this paper was to compare and analyze the grades on homework assigned directly from the textbook and those created and assigned for the first time by the instructor. In the latter case, the solutions were impossible to find by the students. The aim was to investigate the differences in performance between the different cases. To this end, a number of instructors in several courses in the Mechanical Engineering Department were alternating homework assignments between those never seen before and the ones from the assigned textbook. The average class grades on these assignments were considered as the performance indicator examined to determine if there is a particular trend. The result of this study shows that the average for the in-house homework was less than that of textbook and the standard deviation for the in-house homework was higher than that of the textbook assigned. It indicates that in-house homework can be used to assess the student learning outcomes. In addition, this study also shows that the difference was higher for Dynamics than the Statics and Strength of Materials. It suggests that for more challenging courses, the differences are more pronounced.
机译:家庭作业一直是所有专业和学科学习的一个组成部分。这些分配通常从教科书中选择,因为这些提供了与手头主题相关的各种问题。在互联网出现之前,解决这些问题的解决方案手册,因为他们在大多数情况下都是在大多数情况下邮寄给教授的硬拷贝。如今,教科书中的几乎任何问题都可以在网络上提供其解决方案,并且许多学生被认为可以访问。由于家庭作业有时用于评估学生学习结果,重要的是要确保学生呈现的工作是描述他们的理解。本文的目的是比较和分析直接从教科书和教师第一次创建和分配的作业的成绩。在后一种情况下,学生不可能找到解决方案。目的是调查不同案件之间性能的差异。为此,机械工程系的几个课程中的许多教练都是在从未见过的那些从未见过的教科书之间的家庭作业。这些作业的平均阶级等级被视为所检查的绩效指标,以确定是否存在特定趋势。本研究结果表明,内部作业的平均值小于教科书的普通作业,内部作业的标准偏差高于分配的教科书的标准偏差。它表明,内部作业可用于评估学生学习结果。此外,本研究还表明,动态的差异高于材料的静态和强度。它表明,对于更具挑战性的课程,差异更明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号