首页> 外文会议>International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles >DIFFICULTIES IN DETERMINING THE CAUSE OF REAL-WORLD CRASH INJURIES: A CASE STUDY OF A NASS INVESTIGATION
【24h】

DIFFICULTIES IN DETERMINING THE CAUSE OF REAL-WORLD CRASH INJURIES: A CASE STUDY OF A NASS INVESTIGATION

机译:确定现实世界碰撞伤害原因的困难:对NASS调查的案例研究

获取原文

摘要

This paper describes a National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) case in which a parked 1958 Chevrolet Bel Air was rear-ended by a 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan whose unbelted driver sustained fatal chest injuries despite the presence of an airbag. This particular case was chosen because different reviewers of the information from the crash investigation have proposed conflicting conclusions about the role of the airbag in the fatal injuries. The NASS investigators and others concluded that the driver bottomed out the airbag resulting in fatal chest injuries. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety researchers concluded that the driver either was out of position due to late firing of the airbag or was slumped over the wheel due to a high blood alcohol concentration; in either case they attributed the fatal injuries to airbag inflation forces. Thus, in one scenario the airbag had insufficient power, and in the others it had too much power. Injury measures from a Hybrid III driver dummy seated in a Grand Caravan in a test re-creation of the real-world crash indicated low risk of serious injury to all body regions except the chest. The recorded chest compression was slightly higher than the injury reference value for a localized loading, but this measurement underestimated actual chest deflection because a postcrash inspection showed that off-axis loading had permanently deformed the ribs. During the crash test the airbag did not deploy late, but contact between the chest and steering wheel occurred because the steering column rotated upward. Separately, two static airbag deployment tests were conducted to determine the likelihood that the airbag could have caused the fatal chest injuries if the driver had been slumped over the wheel. Injury measures from these tests indicated a significant injury risk when the dummy was positioned close to the airbag module. The test results refute the hypothesis that the driver bottomed out the airbag; instead, either steering column movement or direct contact with the deploying airbag are the most likely cause of the fatal injuries.
机译:本文介绍了一个国家汽车采样系统(NASS)案例,其中一个停放的1958年雪佛兰Bel Air被1991年躲避大篷车追尾,尽管存在安全气囊,但仍然存在未隐性的司机持续致命的胸部受伤。选择了这种特殊情况,因为碰撞调查的信息的不同审查人员已经提出了关于安全气囊在致命伤害中的作用的矛盾的结论。 NASS调查员和其他人得出结论,驾驶员触底安全气囊导致致命的胸部受伤。高速公路安全研究所的保险研究所得出结论,由于高血液醇浓度,驾驶员未触发安全气囊的次射击或者在车轮上坍塌;在任何一种情况下,他们将致命伤害归因于安全气囊通胀力量。因此,在一种情况下,气囊的力量不足,并且在其他情况下它具有太多的功率。来自一个杂交III驾驶员假人的伤害措施在一个大篷车中,在测试重新创建真实世界的崩溃中表明,除胸部外的所有身体区域都会严重伤害的风险很低。记录的胸部压缩略高于局部负荷的损伤参考值,但这种测量低估了实际的胸部偏转,因为Postcrash检查表明,轴轴负载永久地变形肋骨。在碰撞试验期间,安全气囊未延迟部署,但胸部和方向盘之间的接触发生,因为转向柱向上旋转。另外,进行了两个静态安全气囊部署测试,以确定如果驾驶员瘫倒在车轮上,气囊可能导致致命的胸部损伤的可能性。从这些测试靠近安全气囊模块定位时,这些试验的伤害措施表明了损伤风险。测试结果反驳了驾驶员触底安全气囊的假设;相反,转向柱运动或与部署安全气囊的直接接触是最可能的致命伤害的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号