首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine / Annual Scientific Conference >Investigating the Effects of Side Airbag Deployment in Real-World Crashes Using Crash Comparison Techniques
【2h】

Investigating the Effects of Side Airbag Deployment in Real-World Crashes Using Crash Comparison Techniques

机译:使用碰撞比较技术研究在现实碰撞中侧面安全气囊展开的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this study was to investigate side airbag (SAB) deployment in near side crashes and compare injuries and contact points between occupants with and without SAB deployment. Using NASS 2000–2008 and selecting for near side cases, with PDOF ± 20 degrees from 90 or 270, for non-pregnant adult belted occupants, there were 20,253 (weighted) SAB deployments. NASS showed that SABs have been increasing within the fleet, comprising 2% of airbags in 2000 and increasing to 33% of airbags in 2008. To investigate deployed SABs, we developed a three-step methology to pair CIREN cases to study the effects of deployment on occupant outcome. The first step involved extracting near side impacts from CIREN with adult, non-pregnant occupants seated in row 1 (drivers or right front passengers). In the second step, each case was quantitatively compared to FMVSS 214 barrier test standards using a 6 point similarity scoring system. Cases scoring at least 3 points were then qualitatively analyzed and 33 pairs of cases of the same vehicle make/model but opposite SAB status were chosen. Occupants with deployed SAB had reduced occurrences and severity of head and face, neck and cervical spine, and thoracic injuries and fewer injurious contacts to side components including the door, a-pillar, and window sill. SAB deployment was statistically significant for reducing occupant MAIS and ISS and thorax airbags were statistically significant for reducing thoracic and neck/cervical spine injury severity. The average ISS with SAB deployment was 21, while the average ISS of those without was 33. This study establishes methods for performing comparisons between CIREN cases based on regulatory conditions and shows injury reduction in key body regions with SAB deployment.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查侧面碰撞中侧面安全气囊(SAB)的展开情况,并比较使用和不使用SAB时乘员之间的伤害和接触点。使用NASS 2000–2008并选择侧边情况,PDOF从90或270±20度±20度,对于未怀孕的成年安全带乘员,部署了20253(加权)的SAB。 NASS显示,机队中的SAB一直在增长,2000年占安全气囊的2%,到2008年增至33%。为了研究已部署的SAB,我们开发了一种三步法对CIREN案例进行配对以研究部署的影响关于乘员结果。第一步涉及从坐在第一排的成人,未怀孕乘员(驾驶员或右前排乘客)中提取CIREN的近侧面影响。第二步,使用6点相似度评分系统将每种情况与FMVSS 214势垒测试标准进行定量比较。然后定性分析得分至少为3分的案例,并选择33对具有相同车辆品牌/型号但SAB状态相反的案例。配备SAB的乘员减少了头面部,颈部和颈椎以及胸部受伤的发生率和严重性,减少了与包括门,A柱和窗台在内的侧部部件的伤害性接触。 SAB部署在减少乘员MAIS和ISS方面具有统计学意义,而胸部安全气囊在减少胸部和颈部/颈椎损伤严重程度方面具有统计学意义。部署SAB的平均ISS为21,而未部署SAB的平均ISS为33。这项研究建立了基于监管条件进行CIREN病例之间比较的方法,并显示了部署SAB的关键身体部位的伤害减轻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号