首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Investigation of the Safety Effects of Knee Bolster Air Bag Deployment in Similar Real-World Crash Comparisons
【24h】

Investigation of the Safety Effects of Knee Bolster Air Bag Deployment in Similar Real-World Crash Comparisons

机译:在类似的真实世界碰撞比较中研究膝部气囊安全气囊展开的安全效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: The lower extremity is the most frequently injured body region and knee-thigh-hip (KTH) injuries account for half of these injuries. Knee bolster air bags (KBABs) have been incorporated in some vehicles to serve as an additional restraint for the occupant's knees and reduce KTH injuries. To investigate the safety benefits of KBABs, similar frontal crashes with opposing KBAB deployment were selected from the Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) database. Methods: An 8-point similarity scoring algorithm was used to quantify crash and occupant similarity and select case comparisons. A total of 183 cases without a KBAB were scored for similarity to 9 KBAB cases. These similarity scores were used to select 31 final case comparisons. The effect of KBAB deployment on occupant injury patterns was investigated with a particular focus on KTH injuries. Results: Over half of the occupants exposed to a KBAB sustained no KTH injuries and a reduction in femur fractures was observed in KBAB occupants (P=0.036). However, increases in proximal tibia/fibula and foot/ankle fractures were observed in KBAB occupants (P=0.022 and 0.002, respectively). Mildly significant decreases in pelvic fractures and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2+ head injuries were observed in the KBAB occupants, supporting the notion that KBABs reduce forward occupant excursion (P=0.094 and 0.055, respectively). Investigation of each case comparison yielded further insight into the reasons for injury pattern differences between cases with opposing KBAB deployment. In addition to KBAB deployment status, differences in occupant factors (age, height, and weight) and crash factors (delta V and belt use) between the cases for a particular comparison could explain variation in injury patterns. Conclusions: The current study presents a preliminary in-depth qualitative and quantitative assessment of KBAB safety benefits. However, further investigation is recommended to provide conclusive evidence of KBAB effectiveness.
机译:目的:下肢是受伤最频繁的身体部位,膝盖大腿(KTH)损伤占这些损伤的一半。某些车辆中已集成了膝垫安全气囊(KBAB),以进一步约束乘员的膝盖并减少KTH伤害。为了研究KBAB的安全性,从碰撞伤害研究与工程网络(CIREN)数据库中选择了与KBAB部署相反的类似正面碰撞。方法:使用8点相似度评分算法来量化碰撞和乘员相似度,并选择案例比较。总共183例无KBAB的病例与9例KBAB的病例相似。这些相似性分数用于选择31个最终案例比较。研究了KBAB部署对乘员伤害模式的影响,特别是针对KTH伤害。结果:接触KBAB的乘员中有一半以上没有受到KTH损伤,KBAB乘员中股骨骨折的发生率降低了(P = 0.036)。然而,在KBAB乘员中观察到胫骨/腓骨近端和足/踝骨折的增加(分别为P = 0.022和0.002)。在KBAB乘员中观察到骨盆骨折轻度显着减少,并出现了严重伤害量表(AIS)2+的轻伤,这支持了KBAB减少前向乘员偏移的观点(分别为P = 0.094和0.055)。通过对每个案例的比较进行调查,可以进一步了解KBAB部署相反的案例之间伤害模式差异的原因。除了KBAB的部署状态外,案例之间的乘员因素(年龄,身高和体重)和碰撞因素(δV和安全带使用)之间的差异还可以解释伤害模式的变化。结论:当前的研究提出了对KBAB安全益处的初步深入的定性和定量评估。但是,建议进一步调查以提供KBAB有效性的确凿证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号