首页> 外文会议>Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology >A Comparison of Two Innovation Tools: Application on Smart Kitchen Design
【24h】

A Comparison of Two Innovation Tools: Application on Smart Kitchen Design

机译:两种创新工具的比较:在智能厨房设计中的应用

获取原文

摘要

The process is one of the significant issues of companies in innovative product design. The designers and the management deal with producing high quality products with the creativity in a short-term period. The researchers developed techniques to solve that problem as TRIZ. The TRIZ-based techniques aim to recover the gaps of the creative innovation to solve specific problems of technical products and technologies. However, the traditional innovation techniques are still preferred for the design process. This study conducted a comparative research on outcomes regarding the process of two design groups. The assignment is given to ten design students to identify the design requirements of smart kitchen design that answers the specific problem and to propose a product through needs and demands. First group with five students applied TRIZ-based techniques, while the other five students applied one of another innovation techniques. In this study the outcomes of the group design of smart kitchen is discussed to compare the application of the process and quality of the products.
机译:该过程是公司创新产品设计中的重要问题之一。设计师和管理层要在短期内处理具有创造力的高质量产品。研究人员开发了技术来解决这个问题,例如TRIZ。基于TRIZ的技术旨在弥补创意创新的不足,以解决技术产品和技术的特定问题。但是,传统的创新技术仍然是设计过程中的首选。这项研究对有关两个设计小组的过程的结果进行了比较研究。该作业分配给十名设计专业的学生,​​以识别可解决特定问题的智能厨房设计的设计要求,并根据需要和要求提出产品。第一组有五名学生应用了基于TRIZ的技术,而其他五名学生则应用了另一种创新技术。在这项研究中,讨论了智能厨房小组设计的结果,以比较过程的应用和产品的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号