首页> 外文会议>Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology >A Comparison of Two Innovation Tools: Application on Smart Kitchen Design
【24h】

A Comparison of Two Innovation Tools: Application on Smart Kitchen Design

机译:两种创新工具的比较:在智能厨房设计中的应用

获取原文

摘要

The process is one of the significant issues of companies in innovative product design. The designers and the management deal with producing high quality products with the creativity in a short-term period. The researchers developed techniques to solve that problem as TRIZ. The TRIZ-based techniques aim to recover the gaps of the creative innovation to solve specific problems of technical products and technologies. However, the traditional innovation techniques are still preferred for the design process. This study conducted a comparative research on outcomes regarding the process of two design groups. The assignment is given to ten design students to identify the design requirements of smart kitchen design that answers the specific problem and to propose a product through needs and demands. First group with five students applied TRIZ-based techniques, while the other five students applied one of another innovation techniques. In this study the outcomes of the group design of smart kitchen is discussed to compare the application of the process and quality of the products.
机译:该过程是创新产品设计中公司的重要问题之一。设计师和管理协议在短期期间生产具有创造力的高质量产品。研究人员开发了解决这个问题作为Triz的技术。基于TRIZ的技术旨在恢复创新创新的差距,以解决技术产品和技术的特定问题。然而,传统的创新技术仍然优选设计过程。本研究对两种设计群程进程进行了比较研究。该作业是十大设计学生,以确定智能厨房设计的设计要求,这些设计回答特定问题,并通过需求和需求提出产品。第一组拥有五名学生应用基于Triz的技术,而另外五个学生应用了另一种创新技术。在这项研究中,讨论了智能厨房组设计的结果,以比较产品的应用和产品的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号