首页> 外文会议>International conference on computational science and its applications >Local Communities and Management of Cultural Heritage of the Inner Areas. An Application of Break-Even Analysis
【24h】

Local Communities and Management of Cultural Heritage of the Inner Areas. An Application of Break-Even Analysis

机译:地方社区和内陆地区文化遗产的管理。盈亏平衡分析的应用

获取原文

摘要

This paper describes an application of Break-Even Analysis (BEA) as an instrument to support public decision-makers in identifying the type of entity to be entrusted with the management of architectural heritage, in the case of absence of public resources for this purpose. The case study is localized in Gerace, a Calabrian small town, in the South of Italy. In particular, in this case, the BEA verifies the economic sustainability of the management of such assets; BEA compares the implications of the entrusting to two different types of entity, private for-profit and private not-for-profit, which have different structures of operating costs. The application of BEA allows us to understand how the expected levels of demand generate sufficient revenue to allow a balanced budget, when the management entity is a private not-for-profit; but they are not sufficient to ensure the profitability needed when the management will be entrusted to a private for profit entity. This implies the need to involve the local community in the management of cultural heritage, through a direct commitment: this role is crucial, for example, in the Inner Areas, when the tourist's flows are insufficient to guarantee the profitability for private for profit subjects. However, if the heritage is a relevant tourist attractor, profits are not direcdy generated by the management of the asset, but significant impacts are still produced on the local economy. This is the reason because the local community have to guarantee anyway the enjoyment of its heritage.
机译:本文介绍了盈亏平衡分析(BEA)的一种应用,该工具可以支持公共决策者在没有公共资源的情况下确定要委托建筑遗产管理的实体类型。案例研究位于意大利南部卡拉布里亚小镇Gerace。特别是在这种情况下,BEA会验证此类资产管理的经济可持续性; BEA将委托的含义与具有不同运营成本结构的两种不同类型的实体(私人营利性组织和私人非营利性组织)进行了比较。 BEA的应用使我们能够理解,当管理实体是私人非营利组织时,预期的需求水平如何产生足够的收入以实现平衡的预算;但是它们不足以确保将管理层委托给私人营利性实体时所需的获利能力。这意味着需要通过直接承诺使当地社区参与文化遗产的管理:例如,在内陆地区,当游客的流量不足以保证私人利益主体的获利能力时,这一作用至关重要。但是,如果遗产是相关的旅游吸引者,则资产管理不会产生直接的利润,但仍会对当地经济产生重大影响。这是因为当地社区无论如何都必须保证享受其遗产。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号