您现在的位置: 首页> 研究主题> 义齿,局部,可摘

义齿,局部,可摘

义齿,局部,可摘的相关文献在2000年到2021年内共计87篇,主要集中在口腔科学、基础医学、药学 等领域,其中期刊论文87篇、专利文献40519篇;相关期刊22种,包括广东牙病防治、口腔颌面修复学杂志、中华口腔医学杂志等; 义齿,局部,可摘的相关文献由229位作者贡献,包括赵彬、王勇、吕培军等。

义齿,局部,可摘—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:87 占比:0.21%

专利文献>

论文:40519 占比:99.79%

总计:40606篇

义齿,局部,可摘—发文趋势图

义齿,局部,可摘

-研究学者

  • 赵彬
  • 王勇
  • 吕培军
  • 朱洪水
  • 何东宁
  • 冯海兰
  • 刘好术
  • 刘斌
  • 吴唯青
  • 周永胜
  • 期刊论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

年份

    • 马珂楠; 陈虎; 叶红强; 周永胜; 王勇; 孙玉春
    • 摘要: 计算机辅助设计、数控切削、增材制造等数字化技术越来越广泛地应用于口腔修复临床.这些技术的应用不仅改变了可摘局部义齿的设计和制作流程,提高了义齿生产效率,而且改变了义齿的设计和制作理念.关于可摘局部义齿计算机辅助设计与辅助制作的研究方兴未艾,近年涌现了大量研究报道,包括选区激光熔化金属粉末等新材料的性能研究,义齿固位体、连接体、人工牙等组件的创新性设计,支架、基托和人工牙的高精度成形,应用新材料、具有新结构的可摘局部义齿的精度、适合性和力学性能定量评价,以及对可摘局部义齿的临床评价等诸多方面,本文针对近年可摘局部义齿计算机辅助设计与辅助制作研究应用最新进展进行系统论述.
    • 肖雪; 袁爱花; 冯海兰; 李思洁; 朱玲; 赵玮
    • 摘要: 目的 研究少汗型外胚叶发育不良(HED)患儿的早期可摘义齿修复方法并评价其临床效果.方法 选取中山大学附属口腔医院修复科2014年5月至2020年1月收治的全部HED患儿共10例,其中男性9例、女性1例,初诊年龄4~7岁.患儿口腔表现为先天无牙或绝大多数牙缺失,采用可摘义齿(全口义齿或可摘局部义齿)进行早期修复.义齿的设计除了较好地恢复牙列的功能外,还尽量避免影响患儿口颌系统和天然牙的发育,修复后每隔3~6个月复诊,根据患儿颌骨及天然牙的萌出和发育调改、重衬或重新制作义齿.随访期1~6年.结果 所有患儿修复后经1~8周后均可适应义齿.在随后的修复效果满意度调查中,所有患儿在美观、发音及自信心等方面均改善明显或较明显;9例患儿咀嚼功能改善明显或较明显;在义齿固位方面,仅2例患儿认为"义齿稳固";9例患儿在随访期颌位关系稳定,面型发育正常,1例患儿因故停戴下颌全口义齿8个月后导致上下颌弓呈反牙合关系,面型呈明显的凹面型.结论 早期可摘义齿修复可恢复HED患儿的咀嚼、发音等功能,并促进颞下颌关节和颌面部的正常发育;正确的人工牙排列位置和基托磨光面形态是改善可摘义齿固位稳定的重要因素;HED患儿无稳定的颌位关系,应根据颌面部及牙槽嵴的解剖标志确定并建牙合;患儿和家长的依从性对治疗效果极为重要.
    • 陈晓珠; 谢逸瑞; 李洁银; 黄娜芝
    • 摘要: 目的 比较多乐氟氟化钠护齿剂、GC护牙素和Flariesse保护漆3种防龋药物在可摘局部义齿基牙中的防龋效果.方法 选择在揭阳市人民医院口腔科行可摘局部义齿修复的牙列缺损患者60例.根据世界牙科联盟临床牙位的记录法,样本为4个区均有天然牙存留者,使用简单随机抽样法随机选取每例患者4个区的基牙分别为多乐氟组、GC护牙素组、Flariesse保护漆组和对照组.试验组基牙半年重复1次涂布相应药物,对照组基牙不处理,2年后复诊检查基牙的龋坏情况.使用卡方检验比较4组基牙的患龋率,检验水准α=0.05.结果 患龋率多乐氟组为14.75%、GC护牙素组为14.71%、Flariesse保护漆组为1.67%、对照组为35.21%.患龋率多乐氟组与GC护牙素组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.000,P=0.994),多乐氟组与Flariesse保护漆组(χ2=6.971,P=0.08)、对照组(χ2=7.180,P=0.08),GC护牙素组与Flariesse保护漆组(χ2=7.038,P=0.008)、对照组(χ2=7.752,P=0.005),以及Flariesse保护漆组与对照组(χ2=23.380,P<0.001)间比较差异均有统计学意义.结论 可摘局部义齿基牙涂布药物可有效预防龋病,且Flariesse保护漆组防龋效果最佳.
    • 刘霜; 闫卉
    • 摘要: 目的 研究临床路径在可摘局部义齿修复游离端牙列缺失患者中的应用价值.方法 选择130例肯氏Ⅰ、Ⅱ类牙列缺损患者,按口腔内余留牙和牙槽嵴黏膜条件相近、肯氏分类及亚类相同的2例为一对,分为65对,均分为临床路径组和传统修复组.比较2组的适应期调改次数,适应期结束后咀嚼是否有力,咀嚼时游离端基托是否存在肉眼可见活动度、基牙龋坏、基齿松动和食物嵌塞情况.结果 临床路径组在适应期调改次数低于传统方法组[1.0(1.0,2.0)次vs.3.0(2.0,4.0)次];适应期结束后调改后咀嚼有力的比例(93.85% vs.76.96%)高于传统方法组,出现肉眼可见动度(0 vs.15.38%)、基牙龋坏(1.54% vs.13.85%)、基牙松动(0 vs.12.31%)及食物嵌塞(1.54% vs.15.38%)比例均低于传统方法组(均P<0.05).结论 临床路径可以提高可摘局部义齿的固位和稳定,遵循临床路径方法制作可摘局部义齿能够减小功能状态下义齿的不稳定性,具有良好的推广前景.%Objective To study the application value of the clinical pathway in the repairing distal extension removable partial denture.Methods One hundred and thirty patients with free-end dentition defect were selected in this study.In the oral cavity,the conditions of the mucosa were similar in terms of the residual teeth and alveolar crest mucosa, and the two groups of the same species were divided into 65 pairs. The random digital table method was used to divide patients into clinical path group and traditional repair group. The frequency of adjustments during the adaptive phase, masticatory efficiency of the denture at ending of the adaptive phase, visible movement of the extension base during the masticatory,decay of abutment,abutments loosen and food embedded plug were compared between the two groups. Results The frequency of adjustments during the adaptive phase was significantly lower in clinical path group than that of traditional repair group [1.00 (1.00, 2.00) times vs. 3.00 (2.00, 4.00) times]. The masticatory efficiency of the denture was higher in clinical path group than that of traditional repair group (93.85% vs. 76.96%). The visible movement of the extension base during mastication (0 vs. 15.38%), decay of abutment (1.54% vs. 13.85%), abutments loosen (0 vs. 12.31%) and food embedded plug(1.54% vs.15.38%)were significantly lower in clinical path group than those of traditional repair group(P<0.05). Conclusion The retention and the stabilization of the removable partial denture can be improved by means of clinical pathway. By following the clinical path method, the removable partial denture shows reduced unstable state of the denture in the functional state and has a good prospect for clinical application.
    • 刘一帆; 于海; 王伟娜; 高勃
    • 摘要: Objective To evaluate the processing accuracy,internal quality and suitability of the titanium alloy frameworks of removable partial denture (RPD) fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) technique,and to provide reference for clinical application.Methods The plaster model of one clinical patient was used as the working model,and was scanned and reconstructed into a digital working model.A RPD framework was designed on it.Then,eight corresponding RPD frameworks were fabricated using SLM technique.Three-dimensional (3D) optical scanner was used to scan and obtain the 3D data of the frameworks and the data was compared with the original computer aided design (CAD) model to evaluate their processing precision.The traditional casting pure titanium frameworks was used as the control group,and the internal quality was analyzed by X-ray examination.Finally,the fitness of the frameworks was examined on the plaster model.Results The overall average deviation of the titanium alloy RPD framework fabricated by SLM technology was (0.089±0.076) mm,the root mean square erTor was 0.103 mm.No visible pores,cracks and other internal defects was detected in the frameworks.The framework fits on the plaster model completely,and its tissue surface fitted on the plaster model well.There was no obvious movement.Conclusions The titanium alloy RPD framework fabricated by SLM technology is of good quality.%目的 用选区激光熔化(selective laser melting,SLM)制作可摘局部义齿(removable partial denture,RPD)钛合金支架,评估其加工精度、内部质量及适合性,为SLM的临床应用提供参考.方法 以1例患者的石膏模型为工作模型,扫描并设计RPD支架,SLM制作8个RPD钛合金支架(Ti-6Al-4V).三维扫描支架,将获取的表面三维数据与原CAD模型对比,评价SLM钛合金支架的加工精度.以传统铸造纯钛支架为对照组,通过X线分析两组支架内部质量,并检查支架在石膏模型上就位的适合性.结果 SLM制作的RPD钛合金支架的加工精度为(0.089±0.076) mm,均方根误差为0.103 mm,支架内部无肉眼可见的气孔、裂痕等缺陷,支架与石膏模型紧密贴合,无明显翘动,适合性良好,与铸造纯钛支架相比无明显差别.结论 SLM制作的RPD钛合金支架成形质量良好.
    • 韩薇; 魏煦; 黄罡; 孙方方
    • 摘要: 目的:探讨功能性压力印模技术对远中游离端缺失牙列缺损可摘局部义齿修复的效果.方法:选取可摘局部义齿修复病人12例,采用功能性压力印模技术,在试支架、转移蜡颌记录的同时完成远中游离缺失鞍基区的闭口式功能性印模,并通过口内戴支架制取全牙列印模,一次完成工作模型的上牙合架过程.结果:所有病人在戴牙时可见基牙与人工牙达到最大面积均匀接触,无明显咬合高点,咀嚼时未见游离端鞍基有明显下沉动度.戴用1周、1个月、3个月后复诊,其中11例远中基牙均无松动,基托与牙槽嵴贴合,自诉咀嚼功能良好,咀嚼有力无压痛;仅1例下颌隆突明显者在戴用1周后出现双侧下颌隆突压痛,经调改缓冲后使用良好.结论:使用功能性压力印模技术制作的牙-黏膜混合支持式可摘局部义齿,操作简单,颌位关系准确,具有良好的应用前景.
    • 蒋海燕; 许玉民; 谢明明
    • 摘要: 目的 研究不同咬(牙合)重建疗法应用于牙列重度磨耗伴缺损的临床效果.方法 选取2013年3月至2015年3月在该院就诊的牙列重度磨耗伴缺损患者82例,依据咬(牙合)重建方式的不同将其分为对照组和研究组,各41例.对照组采取(牙合)垫式可摘局部义齿修复,研究组则采用固定义齿修复,以咀嚼效率、患者主观感受及效果等为标准对两组修复效果予以评析.结果 两组在修复1个月、1年后的咀嚼效率均较修复前获得明显改善,且研究组在修复1个月、1年后的改善程度均显著优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组舒适、美观满意及咀嚼有力情况显著优于对照组,基牙继发龋、食物嵌塞发生率显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 应用固定义齿对牙列重度磨耗伴缺损进行咬(牙合)重建可显著改善牙齿咀嚼效能,恢复牙列完整,且不易发生基牙继发龋,舒适、美观,建议临床加以重视并推广应用.
    • 何雨桐; 沈玉凤; 刘晶; 张悦; 何惠宇
    • 摘要: 背景:临床研究表明,圆锥型套筒冠义齿修复少数牙残存牙列缺损的远期效果明显优于传统可摘局部义齿,但目前应用有限元法分析这两种修复方式的研究还较少。目的:比较圆锥型套筒冠义齿和传统可摘义齿修复孤立基牙的应力分布。方法:采用CT扫描获取健康成人下颌骨及牙列的二维图像,通过计算机重建技术分别建立下颌仅保留双侧尖牙的圆锥型套筒冠义齿和传统可摘义齿三维有限元模型,在相同垂直载荷和斜向载荷下,比较两种修复方式的基牙、基牙牙周膜及缺牙区牙槽嵴的最大等效应力。结果与结论:垂直与斜向载荷下,传统可摘义齿组基牙、基牙牙周膜的总体应力均大于圆锥型套筒冠义齿组,且卡环对应处存在明显应力集中;圆锥型套筒冠义齿组缺牙区牙槽嵴的总体应力稍大,但应力分布相对较均匀,应力集中范围小。斜向载荷下,两组基牙、基牙牙周膜、缺牙区牙槽嵴的总体应力均大于垂直载荷下的应力,且在基牙牙周膜舌侧颈部均存在应力集中,但传统可摘义齿的总体应力更大,应力集中范围更广。结果表明,采用圆锥型套筒冠义齿修复孤立尖牙时,其支持组织应力分布相对较均匀,应力集中范围小,更有利于基牙、牙周组织及缺牙区牙槽嵴的健康。
    • 杨雪; 荣起国; 杨亚东
    • 摘要: Objective: To compare influences of different retention attachments on stress among supporting structures .Methods: By 3-dimensional laser scanner and reverse engineering computer aided design ( CAD) software , a basic partially edentulous digital model with mandibular premolar and molar missing was established .Implant attachment and removable partial dentures ( RPD) were added into the basic model to build three kinds of models: RPD only, RPD +implant +Locator attachment , and RPD +implant +Magfit attachment .Vertical and inclined loads were put on artificial teeth unilaterally . By means of 3-dimensional finite element analysis , the stress distribution and displacement of the main supportive structures were compared . Results: A complete 3-dimensional finite element model was established , which contained tooth structure , and periodontal structures .The displacement of the denture was smaller in Locator (9.38μm vertically, 45.48μm obliquely) and Magfit models (9.54μm vertically, 39.45 μm obliquely) compared with non-implant RPD model (95.27 μm vertically, 155.70 μm oblique-ly) .Compared with the two different attachments , cortical bone stress value was higher in Locator model ( Locator model 10.850 MPa vertically , 43.760 MPa obliquely;Magfit model 7.100 MPa vertically , 19.260 MPa obliquely).The stress value of abutment periodontal ligamentin Magfit model (0.420 MPa vertically) was lower than that in Locator model (0.520 MPa vertically).Conclusion:The existence of implant could reduce maximum von Mises value of each supportive structure when Kennedy Ⅰpartially edentulous mandible was restored .Comparing the structure of Magfit and Locator attachment , the contact of Magfit attachment was rigid , while Locator was resilient .Locator attachment could improve stability of the denture dramatical -ly.Locator had stronger effect on defending horizontal movement of the denture .%目的:研究种植支持可摘局部义齿修复下颌远中游离端缺失的应力分布,探讨附着体类型对于种植体、各支持组织、义齿以及附着体的应力影响。方法:建立可摘局部义齿修复下颌双侧前磨牙和磨牙缺失的KennedyⅠ类牙列缺损的三维有限元模型,分别为采用传统可摘局部义齿(无种植体)、种植体+Locator附着体+可摘局部义齿、种植体+Magfit磁性附着体+可摘局部义齿进行修复。分析对比各主要成分的应力分布,得到最大von Mises应力值和位移值。结果:建立含有牙体组织、牙周组织以及种植体、附着体、可摘局部义齿的三维有限元模型。有种植体的模型义齿基托下黏骨膜的最大位移量(Locator模型垂直向载荷9.38μm、斜向载荷45.48μm,Magfit模型垂直向载荷9.54μm、斜向载荷39.45μm)小于没有种植体的RPD(removable partial dentures)模型(模型垂直向载荷95.27μm,斜向155.70μm)。 Locator和Magfit两种类型的附着体相比较,Locator模型中种植体颈部周围皮质骨的最大应力值大于Magfit模型(Locator模型垂直向载荷10.850 MPa、斜向载荷43.760 MPa,Magfit模型垂直向载荷7.100 MPa、斜向载荷19.260 MPa)。 Magfit 模型中末端基牙的牙周膜受力更小( Locator 模型垂直向载荷0.520 MPa,Magfit模型垂直向载荷0.420 MPa)。结论:在修复下颌KennedyⅠ类牙列缺损时,种植支持可摘局部义齿可减少对末端基牙的扭力,提高义齿稳定性;Locator和Magfit磁性附着体两者对比,Locator附着体水平约束作用更大。
    • 梁冲华; 钟玉修; 庞明月; 李伶
    • 摘要: 目的:观察冠髓切除术在套筒冠义齿修复中的应用效果,改变活髓牙做基牙时常规行根管治疗的做法,简化套筒冠牙齿修复的前期准备。方法选取2010年2月至2014年5月口腔门诊要求做义齿修复的18例46颗活髓基牙行冠髓切除术,术后每半年复查,跟踪2年,观察其效果。结果半年内出现冷热过敏2例,1年内出现牙髓坏死并发瘘管3例,其余患者效果良好。结论以活髓牙作为基牙,在套筒冠义齿修复时不必常规做根管治疗,可以直接做冠髓切除术,简化了操作程序。
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号