首页> 外文OA文献 >Bridging the Post-Soviet and the Postcolonial. How can the Soviet colonies be located within the Postcolonial discourse? A case study of Poland and Romania
【2h】

Bridging the Post-Soviet and the Postcolonial. How can the Soviet colonies be located within the Postcolonial discourse? A case study of Poland and Romania

机译:桥接后苏联和后殖民。苏联殖民地如何位于后殖民话语中?波兰和罗马尼亚的个案研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis will use qualitative research methods in order to bridge the gap between the Post-Soviet and the Postcolonial studies. Over the past years Postcolonial literature began dominating Universities across the world. The theories presented by Postcolonial scholars are gaining more legitimacy in the international arena, providing an insight into the identity crisis experienced by the global society. This piece will analyse the two main concepts presented by Postcolonial scholars: the Empire and Modernity. The concepts will be examined in the light of Post-Soviet literature. The interrelation of Postcolonial theory with the narrative on Soviet dominance in Eastern Europe will unveil the extent to which U.S.S.R can be considered as a colonial Empire. The Soviet rule did not only have the negative consequences on the material and social infrastructure of Eastern European nations, the colonial power has also contributed to the creation of a stereotype of “Eastern bloc” and the belief in a clear cut divide of Europe, which also is referred as the “Iron Curtain”. Such stereotypes still inhabit the imagination of many across the world. Nevertheless such conception of Eastern Europe is inaccurate as portrayed by the comparison of the historical narratives from Romania and Poland in the later part of the thesis. The article will conclude with the manner in which these stereotypes have been resisted within and outside of the Eastern side of the “Iron Curtain””.
机译:本文将采用定性研究方法,以弥合后苏联研究与后殖民研究之间的差距。在过去的几年中,后殖民文学开始统治世界各地的大学。后殖民主义学者提出的理论在国际舞台上正变得越来越合法,从而为全球社会所经历的身份危机提供了见识。本文将分析后殖民学者提出的两个主要概念:帝国和现代性。这些概念将根据后苏联文学进行考察。后殖民理论与关于东欧的苏联统治地位的叙述之间的相互联系将揭示苏联在多大程度上可以被视为殖民帝国。苏维埃统治不仅对东欧国家的物质和社会基础设施造成负面影响,而且殖民势力还促成了“东方集团”的刻板印象的形成以及对欧洲明确划分的信念。也称为“铁幕”。这种陈规定型观念仍然存在于世界上许多人的想象中。然而,通过对罗马尼亚和波兰的历史叙述进行比较,可以得出这样的东欧概念是不正确的。本文将以在“铁幕”东侧内部和外部抵制这些陈规定型观念的方式结束。

著录项

  • 作者

    Oleszczynski Jaroslaw;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号