首页> 外文OA文献 >A Cognitive Human Error Analysis with CREAM in Control Room of Petrochemical Industry
【2h】

A Cognitive Human Error Analysis with CREAM in Control Room of Petrochemical Industry

机译:石化行业控制室中CREAM的人为错误认知分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The cognitive human error analysis technique is one of the second-generation techniques used to evaluate human reliability; it has a strong, detailed theoretical background that focuses on the important cognitive features of human behavior.udObjectives: The aim of this study was to assign task and jobs crisis using analysis of cognitive human error with CREAM. Finally, based on the results, the major causes of error were detected.udMethods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 53 people working in an olefin unit. It is one of the most important control rooms located in a special economic zone in Assaluyeh petrochemical industry. In this study, first a job analysis was conducted and the sub-tasks and conditions affecting the performance of the staff were determined. Then, the control mode coefficient andudcontrol mode type, as well as the possibility of total error were determined. Finally, the cognitive functions and type of cognitive error related to each sub-task were identified.udResults: Amongthe six evaluated occupational tasks, the tasks performed by board-manandsite-manhadthe highest values of total human error in terms of transitory overall error coefficient (0.056 and 0.031, respectively). In addition, the following results wereudobtained on the basis of the extended CREAM: execution failure (31.72%), interpretation failure (29.20%), planning failure (14.63%), and observation failure (24.39%).udConclusions: Common Performance Conditions (CPCs), empowerment, and the time available for work were among the most important factors that reduced occupational performance. To optimize a communication system, it is necessary to arrange the priority of tasks, hold joint meetings, inform the staff about the termination of work permits, hold training sessions, and measure the pollutants.udKeywords: Human Error, Control Room, Petrochemical Industry, CREAM
机译:背景:认知人为错误分析技术是用于评估人的可靠性的第二代技术之一。 ud目标:本研究的目的是通过使用CREAM对人为认知的错误分析来分配任务和工作危机。最后,基于结果,找出了导致错误的主要原因。 ud方法:这项横断面研究是针对在烯烃单元中工作的53个人进行的。它是位于Assaluyeh石化工业经济特区的最重要的控制室之一。在这项研究中,首先进行了工作分析,并确定了影响员工绩效的子任务和条件。然后,确定控制模式系数和 udcontrol模式类型以及总误差的可能性。最后,确定了与每个子任务相关的认知功能和认知错误的类型。 ud结果:在六个评估的职业任务中,董事会人员和现场人员所执行的任务在瞬时总体错误系数方面具有最高的总人为错误值(分别为0.056和0.031)。此外,在扩展的CREAM基础上获得了以下结果:执行失败(31.72%),解释失败(29.20%),计划失败(14.63%)和观察失败(24.39%)。 ud结论:常见绩效条件(CPC),授权和工作时间是降低职业绩效的最重要因素。为了优化通信系统,有必要安排任务的优先级,召开联席会议,通知工作人员终止工作许可,举行培训班并测量污染物。 ud关键字:人为错误,控制室,石化行业, 奶油

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号