首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Occupational Hygiene >Determining Human Error Global Causes in a Petrochemical Control Room with a Cognitive Analytical Approach-CREAM
【24h】

Determining Human Error Global Causes in a Petrochemical Control Room with a Cognitive Analytical Approach-CREAM

机译:用认知分析方法-CREAM确定石化控制室中的人为错误的整体原因

获取原文
       

摘要

Control room is the heart of each system in which even a minor error can result in irrecoverable consequences. The purpose of this study was to determine the Probable Control Modes (PCMs) and Cognitive Failure Probability (CFP), and also build a Cognitive Demands Profile (CDP) in a petrochemical control room, using Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis technique (CREAM). First, tasks of Boardman (B.M), Shift Control (S.C), and Head Control (H.C) in control room were analyzed, applying hierarchical task analysis. Following, PCM, CFP and CDP were determined for the analyzed tasks. According the results, control modes for the tasks of B.M and S.C were determined as opportunistic; while for H.C tasks it was obtained as tactical. Of the all error types, execution failure (48.57%), interpretation failure (18.57%), planning failure (15.71%), and observation failure (17.15%) were identified. The most important CDPs were communicate, monitor, execute, plan, diagnose, evaluate, co-ordinate, verity, record, and scan. Based on the findings, number of simultaneous goals, time of day and adequacy of training and experience in the study field were the Common Performance Conditions that led to reduction of performance reliability. These factors contributed to the opportunistic control mode. In order to prevent or reduce cognitive errors in the control room, we need to know the exact type of cognitive activities, and develop a comprehensive program to increase the knowledge and skills for performing the cognitive activities.
机译:控制室是每个系统的核心,即使是很小的错误也可能导致无法挽回的后果。这项研究的目的是使用认知可靠性和错误分析技术(CREAM)确定可能的控制模式(PCM)和认知失败概率(CFP),并在石化控制室中建立认知需求概况(CDP)。首先,应用分层任务分析,分析了控制室中的局局长(B.M),班次控制(S.C)和人头控制(H.C)的任务。随后,确定了用于分析任务的PCM,CFP和CDP。根据结果​​,确定了B.M和S.C任务的控制方式是机会性的;而对于H.C任务,这是战术上获得的。在所有错误类型中,确定了执行失败(48.57%),解释失败(18.57%),计划失败(15.71%)和观察失败(17.15%)。最重要的CDP是沟通,监视,执行,计划,诊断,评估,协调,真实性,记录和扫描。根据发现,共同目标的数量,一天中的时间以及研究领域中足够的培训和经验是导致绩效可靠性下降的共同绩效条件。这些因素促成机会控制模式。为了防止或减少控制室中的认知错误,我们需要了解认知活动的确切类型,并制定一项全面的计划以增加执行认知活动的知识和技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号