首页> 外文OA文献 >The Effect of Sample and Sample Matrix on DNA Processing: Mechanisms for the Detection and Management of Inhibition in Forensic Samples
【2h】

The Effect of Sample and Sample Matrix on DNA Processing: Mechanisms for the Detection and Management of Inhibition in Forensic Samples

机译:样品和样品基质对DNa加工的影响:法医样品中抑制的检测和管理机制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The presence of inhibitory substances in biological forensic samples has, and continues to affect the quality of the data generated following DNA typing processes. Although the chemistries used during the procedures have been enhanced to mitigate the effects of these deleterious compounds, some challenges remain. Inhibitors can be components of the samples, the substrate where samples were deposited or chemical(s) associated to the DNA purification step. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the extraction processes and their ability to handle the various types of inhibitory substances can help define the best analytical processing for any given sample. A series of experiments were conducted to establish the inhibition tolerance of quantification and amplification kits using common inhibitory substances in order to determine if current laboratory practices are optimal for identifying potential problems associated with inhibition. DART mass spectrometry was used to determine the amount of inhibitor carryover after sample purification, its correlation to the initial inhibitor input in the sample and the overall effect in the results. Finally, a novel alternative at gathering investigative leads from samples that would otherwise be ineffective for DNA typing due to the large amounts of inhibitory substances and/or environmental degradation was tested. This included generating data associated with microbial peak signatures to identify locations of clandestine human graves. Results demonstrate that the current methods for assessing inhibition are not necessarily accurate, as samples that appear inhibited in the quantification process can yield full DNA profiles, while those that do not indicate inhibition may suffer from lowered amplification efficiency or PCR artifacts. The extraction methods tested were able to remove u3e90% of the inhibitors from all samples with the exception of phenol, which was present in variable amounts whenever the organic extraction approach was utilized. Although the results attained suggested that most inhibitors produce minimal effect on downstream applications, analysts should practice caution when selecting the best extraction method for particular samples, as casework DNA samples are often present in small quantities and can contain an overwhelming amount of inhibitory substances.
机译:生物法医样品中抑制物质的存在已经并且继续影响着DNA分型过程后生成的数据的质量。尽管已增强了程序中使用的化学物质以减轻这些有害化合物的影响,但仍存在一些挑战。抑制剂可以是样品的成分,样品沉积的底物或与DNA纯化步骤相关的化学物质。因此,对提取过程及其处理各种抑制性物质的能力的透彻了解可以帮助定义任何给定样品的最佳分析过程。进行了一系列实验,以建立使用常见抑制性物质的定量和扩增试剂盒的抑制耐受性,以确定当前的实验室实践是否最适合识别与抑制相关的潜在问题。 DART质谱用于确定样品纯化后抑制剂残留的数量,其与样品中初始抑制剂输入的相关性以及结果的总体效果。最后,测试了一种从样品中收集调查线索的新方法,该方法否则会由于大量抑制性物质和/或环境降解而对DNA分型无效。这包括生成与微生物峰特征相关的数据,以识别秘密人类坟墓的位置。结果表明,目前评估抑制作用的方法不一定准确,因为在定量过程中被抑制的样品可以产生完整的DNA谱图,而那些没有显示抑制作用的样品可能会受到扩增效率或PCR伪影的影响。所测试的萃取方法能够从所有样品中除去90%的抑制剂,但酚除外,每当使用有机萃取方法时,苯酚就以可变的量存在。尽管所获得的结果表明大多数抑制剂对下游应用的影响最小,但分析人员在为特定样品选择最佳提取方法时应谨慎行事,因为个案DNA样品通常数量很少,并且可能含有大量抑制物质。

著录项

  • 作者

    Moreno Lilliana I;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号