首页> 外文OA文献 >EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ); Scientific Opinion on the public health risks related to mechanically separated meat (MSM) derived from poultry and swine
【2h】

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ); Scientific Opinion on the public health risks related to mechanically separated meat (MSM) derived from poultry and swine

机译:EFsa生物危害小组(BIOHaZ);关于与家禽和猪相关的机械分离肉(msm)相关的公共卫生风险的科学意见

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this assessment was to identify public health risks linked to mechanically separated meat (MSM) types from pork and poultry and compare them with fresh meat, minced meat and meat preparations (non-MSM); and to select, rank and suggest objective measurement methods and values for parameters to distinguish MSM types. Microbial hazards in MSM are expected to be similar to those in non-MSM, although the risk of microbial growth increases with the degree of muscle fibre degradation, thus with the separation pressure. For the distinction between the different types of MSM and non-MSM chemical, histological, molecular, textural and rheological parameters were considered as potential indicators. The analysis of available published data suggested that calcium and, if confirmed cholesterol content, was the only appropriate chemical parameters which could be used to distinguish MSM from non-MSM products. On the basis of published data, a model was developed to derive probabilities for a product to be classified as MSM based on the calcium content. Calcium content of 100 mg/100 g, as specified in the Reg. (EC) No. 2074/2005, corresponds to probability of 93.6% for a product to be classified as MSM, according to the model developed. Calcium content alone does not allow differentiation between low pressure MSM and other meat products, and other validated tests would be necessary. Histological parameters considered include microscopic detection of different tissues and their changes. The latter is a promising method for distinction of MSM types, but further validation is needed. In order to improve methods for MSM identification, specifically designed studies for the collection of data obtained by standardised methods on indicators such as calcium and cholesterol should be undertaken, while studies based on combinations of different parameters could also be useful.
机译:评估的目的是确定与猪肉和家禽的机械分离肉(MSM)类型相关的公共健康风险,并将其与新鲜肉,碎肉和肉制品(非MSM)进行比较;并选择,排序和建议客观的测量方法和参数值,以区分MSM类型。尽管微生物生长的风险会随着肌肉纤维降解程度的增加而增加,进而随着分离压力的增加而增加,但MSM中的微生物危害与非MSM相似。为了区分不同类型的MSM和非MSM化学物质,组织学,分子,质地和流变参数被视为潜在的指标。对可获得的公开数据的分析表明,钙以及胆固醇含量(如果已确认)是唯一可用于区分MSM和非MSM产品的化学参数。根据已发布的数据,开发了一个模型,以基于钙含量得出产品归为MSM的概率。钙的含量为100 mg / 100 g,具体规定见(EC)2074/2005,根据开发的模型,对应于被归类为MSM的产品的93.6%的概率。单独的钙含量不能区分低压MSM和其他肉制品,因此需要其他经过验证的测试。所考虑的组织学参数包括不同组织的显微检测及其变化。后者是区分MSM类型的有前途的方法,但需要进一步验证。为了改进MSM识别的方法,应进行专门设计的研究,以收集通过标准化方法获得的有关指标(例如钙和胆固醇)的数据,而基于不同参数组合的研究也可能有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号