We propose a simple and intuitive cost mechanism which assigns costs for the competitive usage of $m$ resources by $n$ selfish agents. Each agent has an individual demand; demands are drawn according to some probability distribution. The cost paid by an agent for a resource she chooses is the total demand put on the resource divided by the number of agents who chose that same resource. So, resources charge costs in an equitable, fair way, while each resource makes no profit out of the agents.We call our model the Fair Pricing model. Its fair cost mechanism induces a non-cooperative game among the agents. To evaluate the Nash equilibria of this game, we introduce the Diffuse Price of Anarchy, as an extension of the Price of Anarchy that takes into account the probability distribution on the demands. We prove:(1) Pure Nash equilibria may not exist, unless all chosen demands are identical. In contrast, we have been able to prove that pure Nash equilibria do exist for two closely related cost sharing models, namely the Average Cost Pricing and the Serial Cost Sharing models.(2) A fully mixed Nash equilibrium exists for all possible choices of the demands. Further on, the fully mixed Nash equilibrium is the unique Nash equilibrium in case there are only two agents. (3) In the worst-case choice of demands, the Price of Anarchy is $Theta (n)$; for the special case of two agents, the Price of Anarchy is less than $2 - frac{1}{m}$.(4) Assume now that demands are drawn from a bounded, independent probability distribution, where all demands are identically distributed and each is at most a (universal for the class) constant times its expectation. Then, the Diffuse Price of Anarchy is at most that same constant, which is just 2 when each demand is distributed symmetrically around its expectation.
展开▼
机译:我们提出了一种简单直观的成本机制,该机制为$ n $自私的代理人竞争性使用$ m $资源分配成本。每个代理商都有自己的需求;根据一些概率分布得出需求。座席为她选择的资源支付的成本是对资源的总需求除以选择相同资源的座席数量。因此,资源以公平,公正的方式收取费用,而每种资源都不会从代理商那里获利。我们称此模型为“公平定价”模型。它的公平成本机制引起了代理商之间的不合作博弈。为了评估该游戏的纳什均衡,我们引入了无政府状态的扩散价格,作为无政府价格的扩展,其中考虑了需求上的概率分布。我们证明:(1)除非所有选择的需求都相同,否则纯纳什均衡可能不存在。相反,我们已经能够证明两个密切相关的成本分摊模型,即平均成本定价模型和序列成本分摊模型,确实存在纯纳什均衡。(2)对于所有可能的选择,存在完全混合的纳什均衡。需要。进一步地,在只有两个代理的情况下,完全混合的纳什均衡是唯一的纳什均衡。 (3)在最坏的需求选择中,无政府状态的价格为$ Theta(n)$;对于两个代理的特殊情况,无政府状态的价格小于$ 2-frac {1} {m} $。(4)现在假设需求是从有界,独立的概率分布中提取的,其中所有需求都是相同的分布,每个值最多是其期望值的乘积(该课程的普遍性)。那么,无政府状态的扩散价格最多是相同的常数,当每个需求围绕其期望对称分布时,该常数仅为2。
展开▼