首页> 外文OA文献 >Proposed automobile steering wheel test method for vibration
【2h】

Proposed automobile steering wheel test method for vibration

机译:提出了汽车方向盘振动试验方法

摘要

This thesis proposes a test method for evaluating the perceived vibration which occurs at the driver's hand in automotive steering wheel interface. The objective of the research was to develop frequency weightings for quantifying the human perception of steering wheel hand-arm vibration. Family of frequency weightings were developed from equal sensation curves obtained from the psychophysical laboratory experimental tests. The previous literature suggests that the only internationally standardised frequency weighting Wh is not accurate to predict human perception of steering wheel hand-arm vibration (Amman et. al, 2005) because Wh was developed originally for health effects, not for the human perception. In addition, most of the data in hand-arm vibration are based upon responses from male subjects (Neely and Burström, 2006) and previous studies based only on sinusoidal stimuli. Further, it has been continuously suggested by researchers (Gnanasekarna et al., 2006; Morioka and Griffin, 2006; Ajovalasit and Giacomin, 2009) that only one weighting is not optimal to estimate the human perception at all vibrational magnitudes. In order to address these problems, the investigation of the effect of gender, body mass and the signal type on the equal sensation curves has been performed by means of psychophysical laboratory experimental tests. The test participants were seated on a steering wheel simulator which consists of a rigid frame, a rigid steering wheel, an automobile seat, an electrodynamic shaker unit, a power amplifier and a signal generator. The category-ratio Borg CR10 scale procedure was used to quantify the perceived vibration intensity. A same test protocol was used for each test and for each test subject. The first experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of gender using sinusoidal vibration with 40 test participants (20 males and 20 females). The results suggested that the male participants provided generally lower subjective ratings than the female participants. The second experiment was conducted using band-limited random vibration to investigate the effect of signal type between sinusoidal and band-limited random vibration with 30 test participants (15 males and 15 females). The results suggested that the equal sensation curves obtained using random vibration were generally steeper and deeper in the shape of the curves than those obtained using sinusoidal vibration. These differences may be due to the characteristics of random vibration which produce generally higher crest factors than sinusoidal vibration. The third experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of physical body mass with 40 test participants (20 light and 20 heavy participants) using sinusoidal vibration. The results suggested that the light participants produced generally higher subjective ratings than the heavy participants. From the results it can be suggested that the equal sensation curves for steering wheel rotational vibration differ mainly due to differences of body size rather than differences of gender. The final experiments was conducted using real road signals to quantify the human subjective response to representative driving condition and to use the results to define the selection method for choosing the adequate frequency weightings for the road signals by means of correlation analysis. The final experiment was performed with 40 test participants (20 light and 20 heavy participants) using 21 real road signals obtained from the road tests. From the results the hypothesis was established that different amplitude groups may require different frequency weightings. Three amplitude groups were defined and the frequency weightings were selected for each amplitude group. The following findings can be drawn from the research: • the equal sensation curves suggest a nonlinear dependency on both the frequency and the amplitude. • the subjective responses obtained from band-limited random stimuli were steeper and the deeper in the shape of the equal sensation curves than those obtained using sinusoidal vibration stimuli. • females provided higher perceived intensity values than the males for the same physical stimulus at most frequencies. • light test participants provided higher perceived intensity than the heavy test participants for the same physical stimulus at most frequencies. • the equal sensation curves for steering wheel rotational vibration differ mainly due to differences in body size, rather than differences of gender. • at least three frequency weightings may be necessary to estimate the subjective intensity for road surface stimuli.
机译:本文提出了一种测试方法,用于评估在汽车方向盘界面中驾驶员手上发生的感觉振动。该研究的目的是开发频率加权,以量化人类对方向盘手臂振动的感知。从心理物理实验室实验测试获得的相等感觉曲线中发展出一系列频率加权。先前的文献表明,唯一国际标准化的频率加权Wh不能准确预测人对方向盘手臂振动的感知(Amman等人,2005年),因为Wh最初是为健康影响而开发的,而不是为了人类的感知而开发的。此外,大多数关于手臂振动的数据都是基于男性受试者的反应(Neely和Burström,2006年),而以前的研究仅基于正弦波刺激。此外,研究人员不断提出建议(Gnanasekarna等,2006; Morioka和Griffin,2006; Ajovalasit和Giacomin,2009),只有一个权重并不是在所有振动幅度下估计人类感知的最佳方法。为了解决这些问题,已经通过心理物理实验室实验研究了性别,体重和信号类型对均等感觉曲线的影响。测试参与者坐在方向盘模拟器上,该模拟器包括刚性框架,刚性方向盘,汽车座椅,电动振动台,功率放大器和信号发生器。类别比率Borg CR10标度程序用于量化感知到的振动强度。每个测试和每个测试对象都使用相同的测试协议。进行了第一个实验,以40位测试参与者(20位男性和20位女性)使用正弦振动研究了性别的影响。结果表明,男性参与者提供的主观评分通常低于女性参与者。第二项实验是使用带限随机振动进行的,以研究30位测试参与者(男15位,女15位)在正弦波和带限随机振动之间的信号类型的影响。结果表明,与使用正弦振动获得的曲线相比,使用随机振动获得的相同感觉曲线通常更陡峭和更深。这些差异可能是由于随机振动的特性所致,该特性通常会产生比正弦振动更高的波峰因数。进行了第三个实验,研究了正弦振动对40名测试参与者(20名轻者和20名重参与者)的身体质量的影响。结果表明,轻度参与者的主观评分通常比重度参与者更高。从结果可以看出,方向盘旋转振动的相同感觉曲线主要是由于车身尺寸的差异而不是性别的差异。最后的实验是使用真实的道路信号进行的,以量化人类对代表性驾驶条件的主观反应,并使用结果定义通过相关分析为道路信号选择适当的频率加权的选择方法。最后的实验是由40名测试参与者(20名轻型参与者和20名重型参与者)使用从路试获得的21条真实道路信号进行的。从结果得出的假设是,不同的振幅组可能需要不同的频率加权。定义了三个振幅组,并为每个振幅组选择了频率加权。可以从研究中得出以下发现:•相同的感觉曲线表明频率和幅度均呈非线性关系。 •从带限随机刺激获得的主观反应比使用正弦振动刺激获得的主观反应更陡峭,并且等值曲线的形状更深。 •在大多数频率下,对于相同的身体刺激,女性提供比男性更高的感知强度值。 •在大多数频率下,对于相同的身体刺激,轻度测试参与者提供的感觉强度要比重度测试参与者更高。 •方向盘旋转振动的相同感觉曲线之所以不同,主要是由于车身尺寸的差异,而不是性别的差异。 •估计路面刺激的主观强度可能至少需要三个频率加权。

著录项

  • 作者

    Giacomin J; Jeon Byung Ho;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号