首页> 外文OA文献 >Postsecondary Teaching and Learning Development Needs: Motivators and Barriers Associated With Participation in Educational Development
【2h】

Postsecondary Teaching and Learning Development Needs: Motivators and Barriers Associated With Participation in Educational Development

机译:高等教育和学习发展需求:与参与教育发展相关的激励因素和障碍

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated instructor perceptions of motivators and barriers that exist with respect to participation in educational development in the postsecondary context. Eight instructors from a mid-size, research intensive university in south-western Ontario participated in semistructured interviews to explore this particular issue. Data were analyzed using a qualitative approach. Motivation theory was used as a conceptual framework in this study, referring primarily to the work of Ryan and Deci (2000), Deci and Ryan (1985), and Pink (2009). The identified motivators and barriers spanned all 3 levels of postsecondary institutions: the micro (i.e., the individual), the meso (i.e., the department or Faculty), and the macro (i.e., the institution). Significant motivators to participation in educational development included desire to improve one’s teaching (micro), feedback from students (meso), and tenure and promotion (macro). Significant barriers to participation included lack of time (micro), the perception that an investment towards one’s research was more important than an investment to enhancing teaching (meso), and the impression that quality teaching was not valued by the institution (macro). The study identifies connections between the micro, meso, macro framework and motivation theory, and offers recommendations for practice.
机译:这项研究调查了教师对高中背景下参与教育发展的动机和障碍的看法。来自安大略省西南部一所中等规模的研究型大学的八名讲师参加了半结构化访谈,以探讨这一特殊问题。使用定性方法分析数据。动机理论被用作本研究的概念框架,主要指的是Ryan和Deci(2000),Deci和Ryan(1985)和Pink(2009)的工作。所确定的激励因素和障碍跨越了高等教育机构的所有三个层次:微观(即个人),中观(即部门或学院)和宏观(即机构)。参与教育发展的重要动机包括改善教学水平的愿望(微观),学生的反馈(中观)以及任期和晋升(宏观)。参与的重大障碍包括时间不足(微观),人们认为对研究的投入比对教学的投入更为重要(中观),以及高质量的教学没有被机构重视的印象(宏观)。该研究确定了微观,内观,宏观框架与动机理论之间的联系,并为实践提供了建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Knorr Kris;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号