首页> 外文OA文献 >Neuropathic pain : somatosensory functions related to spontaneous ongoing pain, mechanical allodynia and pain relief
【2h】

Neuropathic pain : somatosensory functions related to spontaneous ongoing pain, mechanical allodynia and pain relief

机译:神经性疼痛:与自发进行性疼痛,机械性异常性疼痛和疼痛缓解相关的体感功能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction and aim: Patients with neuropathic pain suffer fromspontaneous ongoing pain and from abnormal stimulus-evoked pain, e.g.,allodynia. Dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA) is evoked by a normallyinnocuous light moving mechanical stimulus on the skin and staticmechanical allodynia (SMA) by a sustained, normally innocuous pressureagainst the skin. Some patients report variable intensity of DMA which attimes is only unpleasant, i.e., dynamic mechanical dysesthesia (DMD). Theaim was to probe for common denominators of sensory disturbances linkedto mechanisms underlying development of or protection against pain aftera traumatic peripheral nerve injury (Study I). Also, we aimed atexamining if short or longer lasting non-painful von Frey filamentstimulation of the neuropathic skin could be used to assess perceptionthresholds to DMA and SMA (Study II). Further, we investigated if DMA isthe hyperbole of DMD both mediated by Abeta fibres in the periphery(Study III). Finally, we explored the modulatory effect of spinal cordstimulation (SCS) on somatosensory functions within the painful area(Study IV).Methods: Using methods of quantitative sensory testing a detailedanalysis of somatosensory functions was performed in patients with andwithout pain after a traumatic peripheral nerve injury (Study I) and inpatients reporting a sustained pain relieving effect of at least 30 %following SCS (Study IV). A compression/ischemia-induced (differential)nerve block in conjunction with repeated quantitative sensory testing ofA-delta and C-fibre function was used to assess which nerve fibrepopulation that contributes to pain at perception threshold level using 1s (vF1) and 10 s (vF10) von Frey filament stimulation of the skin (StudyII). The same approach was used to study which part of the peripheralfibre spectrum that contributes to DMA and DMD (Study III).Results: Pain patients reported allodynia to cold and pressure inconjunction with an increase in the perception threshold to non-painfulwarmth on the injured side compared to the uninjured side. Painfreepatients reported hypoesthesia to light touch, cold and warmth on theinjured side. No significant difference could be demonstrated comparingside-to-side differences between patients with and without pain. Duringthe nerve block elevation of vF1 and vF10 occurred simultaneously andsignificantly prior to an increase in the perception level to cold orwarmth. During the nerve block there was a transition of DMA to DMD inall patients with peripheral neuropathic pain and in 3/7 patients withcentral post stroke pain. Remaining patients lost DMA without transition.The transition/loss of DMA occurred early and concurrently in time in allpatients paralleled by a continuous impairment of mainly A-beta fibrefunction. Following SCS decreased perception threshold to light touch andincreased perception threshold to pressure pain were found in theneuropathic area when comparing with pre-stimulation values. Compared tothe contralateral side these perception thresholds changed towardsnormalisation also including a significant normalisation of theperception threshold to non painful cold. SCS did not alter sensitivityto noxious temperature stimulation.Conclusions: Increased pain sensitivity to cold and pressure was found onthe injured side in pain patients, pointing to hyperexcitability in thepain system, not verified by a more challenging analysis of side-to sidedifferences between patients with and without pain. A-beta fibres are theperipheral mediators of both vF1 and vF10 although different receptororgans may be involved, i.e., rapidly (RA) and slowly (SA-I) adaptingmechanoreceptors, respectively. We suggest DMA to be the hyperbole ofDMD, the difference being the number of mechanoreceptive fibres havingaccess to the nociceptive system. Sensory alterations following SCSindicate a possible link to the release of a functional block onsomatosensory function induced by activity in the nociceptive system. Nosignificant correlation could be demonstrated between the degree ofthreshold alterations versus the degree of SCS-induced pain relief.
机译:简介和目的:患有神经性疼痛的患者患有自发性进行性疼痛和异常刺激引起的疼痛,例如异常性疼痛。动态的机械性异常性疼痛(DMA)是由皮肤上正常无害的光运动机械刺激引起的,而静态的机械性异常性疼痛(SMA)是由持续的,对皮肤无害的正常压力引起的。一些患者报告了可变强度的DMA,有时只是令人不快的,即动态机械感觉障碍(DMD)。目的是探讨与周围神经损伤后发展或预防疼痛的机制有关的感觉障碍的共同标准(研究I)。同样,我们的目标是,如果神经病性皮肤的短或更长持续时间的非痛苦性von Frey细丝刺激可用于评估对DMA和SMA的感知阈值,则旨在进行texamining(研究II)。此外,我们研究了DMA是否都是由周围Abeta纤维介导的DMD的夸张(研究III)。最后,我们探讨了脊髓刺激(SCS)对疼痛区域内体感功能的调节作用(研究IV)。方法:使用定量感官测试的方法,对创伤性周围神经损伤后无疼痛的患者进行了体感功能的详细分析损伤(研究I)和住院患者报告的SCS后持续缓解疼痛至少达到30%(研究IV)。使用压迫/缺血诱导的(差异性)神经阻滞,结合对A-δ和C纤维功能的反复定量感官测试,使用1s(vF1)和10s(vF1)评估哪种神经纤维在知觉阈值水平上有助于疼痛。 vF10)von Frey刺激皮肤细丝(StudyII)。使用相同的方法研究了外周纤维频谱的哪些部分对DMA和DMD产生了影响(研究III)。结果:疼痛患者报告异常性疼痛感冒和压力不正常,受伤侧非疼痛性温暖的感知阈值增加相比未受伤的那一面无痛患者报告感觉低下,受伤侧轻触,寒冷和温暖。比较有疼痛和无疼痛患者之间的左右差异,没有发现明显差异。在神经阻滞过程中,vF1和vF10的升高同时发生,并且显着发生在对冷或暖的知觉水平增加之前。在神经阻滞过程中,所有周围神经性疼痛患者和中风后中枢性疼痛患者的3/7患者均存在DMA到DMD的转变。其余患者在没有过渡的情况下丢失了DMA。在所有患者中,DMA的过渡/丢失都在早期和同时发生,同时主要是A-β纤维功能持续受损。与刺激前的值相比,SCS后在神经病变区域发现对轻触的感知阈值降低,对压力疼痛的感知阈值增加。与对侧相比,这些感知阈值朝着正常化方向变化,还包括对非疼痛感冒的知觉阈值的显着标准化。结论:疼痛患者的受伤侧对寒冷和压力的疼痛敏感性增加,这表明疼痛系统的过度兴奋性,未通过更具挑战性的分析来验证疼痛患者之间的侧面差异。没有痛苦。尽管可能涉及不同的受体器官,即快速(RA)和缓慢(SA-1)适应性机械受体,但A-β纤维是vF1和vF10的外周介质。我们建议DMA是DMD的夸张,区别在于可以进入伤害感受系统的机械感受纤维的数量。 SCS后的感觉改变表明可能与伤害性系统的释放有关,后者是由伤害感受系统中的活性诱导的。阈值改变程度与SCS引起的疼痛缓解程度之间没有显着相关性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Landerholm Åsa;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号