首页> 外文OA文献 >Techniques for Assessing the Socio-Economic Effects of Vehicle Mileage Fees
【2h】

Techniques for Assessing the Socio-Economic Effects of Vehicle Mileage Fees

机译:评估车辆里程费用的社会经济影响的技术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This project considers the socio-economic impacts of the new highway user fee structure made possible by advanced technology. The fee structure also has implications for land use and healthy communities ( urban/rural, income distributional, and environmental impacts). The 2001 Oregon Legislature created the Road User Fee Task Force (RUFTF) to make recommendations regarding a potential replacement for the gasoline tax. A vehicle mile tax has subsequently been proposed as the replacement. Preliminary work has been devoted to exploring technical and institutional options for implementation of such a charge. OSU researchers have developed the technology and there is a pilot project in progress in the Portland area that tests charging vehicle mile road user fees using this technololgy. Media feedback on the proposed vehicle-mile tax has focused on 1) the possible (dis) incentives it could provide to the adoption of more fuel efficient vehicles 2) how the tax may unevenly impact drivers in urban versus rural Oregon, and 3) whether the change in tax structure will have an adverse impact on low income groups. The purpose of this study is to develop a model which provides an analytical framework from which to quantify the impact of changing to the proposed vehicle-mile tax. ODOT will use the results from this study to help formulate the specific form of the vehicle-mile tax (flat tax, a graduated tax, a higher tax for less fuel efficient vehicles, a differential tax for urban/rural areas, etc.). Perhaps just as important is the fact that ODOT needs some quantitative information on the socio-economic impact of such a tax, to use in public relations. A huge factor in determining the ultimate adoption of such a tax structure will be the public acceptance of this change and, in turn, they need to have full information on what it will do. Given the decreasing ability of the gasoline tax to cover the costs of the highway system, an alternative financing scheme is necessary to insure future mobility. There are also implications for environmental stewardship as a vehicle-mile tax has also been suggested as an emissions tax. Finally, once the technology is in place for a vehicle-mile tax, it becomes possible to implement a vehicle-mile tax that may vary by time of day and location, providing an efficient congestion pricing tool. The FHWA has five focus areas for policy research as listed in USDOT, Research, Development, and Technology Plan, 6th edition, FY 2005. One is developing analytical tools to evaluate the impacts of a broad range of highway policy options (p. 4-12). Under Future Direction in Highway Finance: to examine the long-term viability of existing highway financing mechanisms and explore issues relating to alternatives, including the future role of the private sector in providing and managing transportation resources. And under Legislative Analysis and Strategic Planning: Support the development, analysis, and implementation of transportation legislation and address strategic initiatives that are likely to influence future legislative and political directions. Thus, this project is consistent with national and state transportation strategies and priorities.
机译:该项目考虑了先进技术带来的新公路使用费结构的社会经济影响。收费结构还对土地使用和健康社区产生影响(城市/农村,收入分配和环境影响)。 2001年,俄勒冈州立法机关成立了道路使用者收费工作组(RUFTF),就可能替代汽油税的建议提出建议。随后提出了车辆里程税作为替代。已经开展了初步工作,以探索实施这种收费的技术和体制选择。 OSU的研究人员已经开发了这项技术,并且在波特兰地区正在进行一个试点项目,该项目使用该技术测试车辆英里道路使用者的收费。媒体对拟议的车辆行驶里程税的反馈意见集中在以下方面:1)可能为采用更省油的车辆提供(激励)激励措施; 2)税收如何可能对俄勒冈州的市区和农村地区的驾驶员产生不均影响;以及3)税收结构的变化将对低收入群体产生不利影响。这项研究的目的是开发一个模型,该模型提供一个分析框架,从中可以量化更改提议的车辆里程税的影响。 ODOT将使用这项研究的结果来帮助制定车辆里程税的特定形式(固定税,分级税,低耗油量车辆较高的税,城市/农村地区的差别税等)。也许同等重要的事实是,ODOT需要一些有关这种税收的社会经济影响的定量信息,以便在公共关系中使用。决定最终采用这种税收结构的一个重要因素将是公众对此变化的接受程度,反过来,他们需要掌握有关其变化的全部信息。鉴于汽油税支付高速公路系统成本的能力下降,因此有必要采用其他融资方案以确保未来的机动性。对环境的管理也有影响,因为车辆里程税也被建议作为排放税。最后,一旦有了适用于车辆里程税的技术,就可以实施随时间和地点而异的车辆里程税,从而提供一种有效的拥堵定价工具。 FHWA的政策研究有五个重点领域,如美国农业部《 2005年财政年度研究,发展和技术计划》第6版所列出。其中一个正在开发分析工具,以评估各种高速公路政策选择的影响(第4-页) 12)。在“公路融资的未来方向”下:检查现有公路融资机制的长期可行性,并探讨与替代方案有关的问题,包括私营部门在提供和管理运输资源方面的未来作用。在立法分析和战略规划下:支持交通立法的制定,分析和实施,并解决可能影响未来立法和政治方向的战略举措。因此,该项目符合国家和州的运输策略和优先事项。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号