首页> 外文OA文献 >Towards the Sustainable City: The Impact of Land Use – Transport Interactions. The impact of accessibility and environment coefficients in location choice on transport strategy performance.
【2h】

Towards the Sustainable City: The Impact of Land Use – Transport Interactions. The impact of accessibility and environment coefficients in location choice on transport strategy performance.

机译:走向可持续发展的城市:土地利用的影响 - 交通互动。位置选择中可达性和环境系数对运输战略绩效的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the last decade the concept of integrated transport strategies for urban areas and a means of evaluating them have been developed and widely accepted into practice by major studies of cities such as London (May and Gardner, 1990), Birmingham (Wenban-Smith et al, 1990) and Edinburgh (May, Roberts and Mason, 1992). The development of integrated transport strategies (May, 1991) has been based on the identification of synergy between transport policy instruments (May and Roberts, 1995). These concepts led indirectly, particularly through experience in Birmingham, to the introduction by the Department of Transport of the Package Approach for urban transport funding (May, 1994a) and more directly to the development of the Common Appraisal Framework for assessing Package Approach bids (MVA et al, 1994). It is now generally accepted that transport strategies designed to meet the objectives of economic efficiency and sustainability will require a combination of measures to manage the existing infrastructure more effectively, to provide selective enhancements to that infrastructure and to impose appropriate pricing mechanisms on both public and private transport. In a recent study, funded by EPSRC, we have developed a methodology for identifying optimal specifications for such strategies, and have shown that their performance is particularly sensitive to the contribution of pricing measures such as fares and road pricing (May, Bonsall, Bristow and Fowkes, 1995). ududHowever, while we are now able to formulate optimal transport strategies, very few studies have been able to demonstrate that transport policy measures alone will achieve a sustainable situation in which fuel consumption and emissions are maintained at or below current levels (May and Roberts, 1995). In most cases, land use changes will need to be co-ordinated with transport measures if sustainability is to be achieved, and recommendations for appropriate land use measures are beginning to emerge (DoE, DoT, 1993; DoE, 1994). An initial assessment of the potential for co-ordinating transport and land use strategies was carried out using the results of the Edinburgh study (Still, 1992), and showed that the preferred transport strategy would be up to 10% more effective in achieving sustainability when combined with a concentrated land use strategy. However, that study assumed no feedback from transport measures to land use effects. Literature reviews and interviews have demonstrated that the impact of transport on land use is perceived as a serious gap in policy understanding. Interviews also revealed that land use-transport models are treated with some scepticism, because there is insufficient understanding of the relationships within them and because the existing models are perceived as unduly complex (Still, 1996). ududAs a result of this lack of understanding, there is a danger that impacts of transport on land use might have counter-productive effects on the land use - transport strategy. For example, road pricing, which may be a key element in a sustainable transport strategy (May, 1994b), may reduce accessibility by private car, and hence lead to outmigration of business, thus producing a less sustainable land use pattern. Conversely it could enhance the city centre environment, and hence encourage certain firms to relocate to the centre. These twin impacts of transport policy on accessibility and on environmental quality are the key elements in predicting the resulting location decisions of individuals and firms, and need to be better understood if sustainable land use - transport strategies are to be developed.
机译:在过去的十年中,城市综合运输策略的概念及其评估方法已经得到发展,并被伦敦(May和Gardner,1990),伯明翰(Wenban-Smith等)等城市的主要研究广泛采纳并付诸实践。 (1990)和爱丁堡(May,Roberts and Mason,1992)。制定综合运输战略(1991年5月)是基于确定运输政策工具之间的协同作用(May和Roberts,1995)。这些概念间接地(特别是通过伯明翰的经验)导致了交通运输部对城市交通资金的打包方式的引入(1994年5月,a),更直接地导致了对打包方式出价的共同评估框架(MVA)的开发。等人,1994)。现在,人们普遍认为,旨在实现经济效率和可持续性目标的交通运输战略将需要采取多种措施,以更有效地管理现有基础设施,对基础设施进行有选择的增强,并对公共和私营部门施加适当的定价机制运输。在EPSRC资助的最新研究中,我们开发了一种方法来确定此类策略的最佳规范,并表明它们的表现对诸如票价和道路定价(May,Bonsall,Bristow和福克斯(1995)。 ud ud但是,尽管我们现在能够制定最佳的运输策略,但很少有研究能够证明仅运输政策措施就能实现可持续发展,其中燃料消耗和排放保持在或低于当前水平(5月和罗伯茨(1995)。在大多数情况下,如果要实现可持续性,就需要将土地用途的变化与运输措施协调起来,并且有关适当的土地用途措施的建议也开始出现(DoE,DoT,1993; DoE,1994)。利用爱丁堡研究的结果(Still,1992)对运输和土地利用战略的协调潜力进行了初步评估,结果表明,在以下情况下,首选的运输战略在实现可持续性方面的效率最高可提高10%:结合集中的土地利用策略。但是,该研究假设运输措施没有反馈土地使用效果。文献综述和访谈表明,运输对土地使用的影响被认为是政策理解上的严重差距。访谈还显示,对土地使用-运输模型存有一些怀疑态度,因为对它们之间的关系了解不足,而且现有模型被认为过分复杂(Still,1996)。由于缺乏了解,因此存在运输对土地使用的影响可能对土地使用产生负面影响的危险-运输策略。例如,公路价格可能是可持续交通运输策略的关键要素(1994年5月,b),它可能会减少私家车的可及性,从而导致企业外迁,从而产生了较不可持续的土地使用方式。相反,它可以改善市中心的环境,从而鼓励某些公司搬迁到市中心。运输政策对交通便利性和环境质量的双重影响,是预测个人和公司最终决定位置的关键要素,如果要制定可持续的土地利用-运输策略,则需要更好地理解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shepherd S.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1998
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号