首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children's fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial.
【2h】

Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children's fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial.

机译:评估学校园艺干预对儿童水果和蔬菜摄入量的影响:一项随机对照试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Current academic literature suggests that school gardening programmes can provide an interactive environment with the potential to change children's fruit and vegetable intake. This is the first cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate whether a school gardening programme can have an effect on children's fruit and vegetable intake. Methods: The trial included children from 23 schools; these schools were randomised into two groups, one to receive the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS)-led intervention and the other to receive the less involved Teacher-led intervention. A 24-hour food diary (CADET) was used to collect baseline and follow-up dietary intake 18 months apart. Questionnaires were also administered to evaluate the intervention implementation. Results: A total of 641 children completed the trial with a mean age of 8.1 years (95% CI: 8.0, 8.4). The unadjusted results from multilevel regression analysis revealed that for combined daily fruit and vegetable intake the Teacher-led group had a higher daily mean change of 8 g (95% CI: -19, 36) compared to the RHS-led group -32 g (95% CI: -60, -3). However, after adjusting for possible confounders this difference was not significant (intervention effect: -40 g, 95% CI: -88, 1; p = 0.06). The adjusted analysis of process measures identified that if schools improved their gardening score by 3 levels (a measure of school gardening involvement - the scale has 6 levels from 0 'no garden' to 5 'community involvement'), irrespective of group allocation, children had, on average, a daily increase of 81 g of fruit and vegetable intake (95% CI: 0, 163; p = 0.05) compared to schools that had no change in gardening score. Conclusions: This study is the first cluster randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate a school gardening intervention. The results have found very little evidence to support the claims that school gardening alone can improve children's daily fruit and vegetable intake. However, when a gardening intervention is implemented at a high level within the school it may improve children's daily fruit and vegetable intake by a portion. Improving children's fruit and vegetable intake remains a challenging task.
机译:背景:当前的学术文献表明,学校园艺计划可以提供一个互动的环境,有可能改变儿童的水果和蔬菜摄入量。这是第一个旨在评估学校园艺计划是否可以影响儿童的水果和蔬菜摄入量的集群随机对照试验(RCT)。方法:该试验包括来自23所学校的儿童;这些学校被随机分为两组,一组接受皇家园艺协会(RHS)领导的干预,另一组接受较少参与的老师指导的干预。使用24小时食物日记(CADET)收集基线和随访饮食,相隔18个月。还进行问卷调查以评估干预措施的实施。结果:共有641名儿童完成了试验,平均年龄为8.1岁(95%CI:8.0,8.4)。多级回归分析的未经调整的结果显示,与RHS领导的小组-32 g相比,教师领导的小组的每日平均水果和蔬菜摄入量具有更高的每日平均变化8 g(95%CI:-19,36) (95%CI:-60,-3)。但是,在调整可能的混杂因素后,这一差异并不显着(干预效果:-40 g,95%CI:-88,1; p = 0.06)。对过程措施的调整分析确定,如果学校将其园艺得分提高了3个等级(一种衡量学校园艺参与程度的标准,则该等级从0个“无花园”到5个“社区参与”有6个等级),无论小组分配如何,孩子与没有园艺成绩变化的学校相比,平均每天增加81g的水果和蔬菜摄入量(95%CI:0,163; p = 0.05)。结论:本研究是第一项旨在评估学校园艺干预措施的整群随机对照试验。结果发现几乎没有证据支持这样的说法,即仅通过学校园艺可以改善儿童的日常水果和蔬菜摄入量。但是,如果在学校内部较高水平的情况下进行园艺干预,则可能会使孩子的日常水果和蔬菜摄入量提高一部分。改善儿童的水果和蔬菜摄入量仍然是一项艰巨的任务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号