A simple mathematical model of competition is developed that includes two alternative mechanisms promoting successional diversity. The first underpins the competition-colonization hypothesis in which early successional species are able to persist because they colonize disturbed habitats before the arrival of late successional dominant competitors. The second underpins the niche hypothesis, in which early successional species are able to persist, even with unlimited colonization by late successional dominants, because they specialize on the resource-rich conditions typical of recently disturbed sites. We modify the widely studied competition-colonization model so that it also includes the mechanism behind the niche hypothesis. Analysis of this model suggests simple experiments that determine whether the successional diversity of a field system is maintained primarily by the competition-colonization mechanism, primarily by the niche mechanism, by neither, or by both. We develop quantitative metrics of the relative importance of the two mechanisms. We also discuss the implications for the management of biodiversity in communities structured by the two mechanisms. ud
展开▼
机译:建立了一个简单的竞争数学模型,其中包括促进替代多样性的两种替代机制。第一个理论支持了竞争殖民化的假设,在该假设中,早期演替物种之所以能够持续存在,是因为它们在晚继任的主导竞争者到达之前将受干扰的栖息地定殖。第二个因素支持利基假说,在这种假说中,即使后来的后代统治者无限制地定居,早期的后继物种也能够持续存在,因为它们专门研究最近受干扰地点典型的资源丰富的条件。我们修改了广泛研究的竞争殖民化模型,使其也包含了利基假说背后的机制。通过对该模型的分析,可以得出一些简单的实验,这些实验确定了主要通过竞争殖民化机制,主要通过利基机制,两者都不是还是两者都维持了田间系统的连续多样性。我们开发了两种机制相对重要性的定量指标。我们还将讨论由这两种机制构成的社区对生物多样性管理的影响。 ud
展开▼