首页> 外文学位 >Understanding why plant diversity declines with increasing soil resource availability: Tests of the important hypotheses.
【24h】

Understanding why plant diversity declines with increasing soil resource availability: Tests of the important hypotheses.

机译:了解为什么植物多样性随着土壤资源可用性的增加而下降:对重要假设的检验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One of the most striking patterns within ecological assemblages is the decline in species richness with increasing resource availability, often referred to as the paradox of enrichment. Currently, we do not understand the mechanisms underlying this ubiquitous pattern. Further, this paradoxical decline in richness may be related to a more general unimodal pattern of species richness and productivity. Specifically, worldwide, across habitats from a few meters to thousands of square kilometers, species richness of a wide variety of plant and animal taxa often peaks at moderate levels of productivity and is lower when productivity is either very low or very high. While there is substantial debate regarding the ubiquity of the unimodal richness productivity curve, however, there is virtually no debate on the general effect of enrichment in plant assemblages: as resource availability rises, species richness declines, and we do not know why. This project seeks to test two of the most prominent mechanisms that have been proposed to explain this widely cited, paradoxical decline in species richness.; Understanding the mechanisms for the decline in richness with increasing fertility remains a challenge to ecologists partly because of the paucity of experimental empirical tests. I have tested two important and general hypotheses that have been proposed to explain this pattern: spatial resource heterogeneity , and assemblage level thinning. Although many other hypotheses exist, these two hypotheses are well grounded in recent theoretical and empirical evidence and each tests an important and basic simplifying assumption of resource competition theory. The experiments and analyses presented herein constitute the first rigorous tests of much long standing dogma in plant ecology. In contrast to long standing, untested dogma, I found that spatial resource heterogeneity played no role in maintaining coexisting among species. Rather, species richness was simply positively related to the average quantity of the limiting resource. Further, I found little evidence to support resource niche differentiation, and strong evidence suggesting that species richness is first and foremost merely a byproduct of the number of individuals in a sample.
机译:生态集合体中最引人注目的模式之一是物种丰富度随着资源可用性的增加而下降,通常被称为“致富悖论”。当前,我们尚不了解这种普遍存在的模式所基于的机制。此外,丰富度的这种自相矛盾的下降可能与物种丰富度和生产力的更普遍的单峰模式有关。具体而言,在全球范围内,从几米到数千平方公里的栖息地,各种各样的动植物分类群的物种丰富度通常在生产力处于中等水平时达到顶峰,而在生产力非常低或很高时则更低。尽管关于单峰丰富度生产力曲线的普遍性存在大量争论,但是,关于植物组合的丰富化的总体影响,实际上没有争论:随着资源可用性的增加,物种丰富度的下降,我们不知道为什么。该项目试图检验提出的两种最重要的机制,以解释这种被广泛引用的物种丰富性自相矛盾的下降。对生态学家的了解,随着生育力的增加,其丰富度下降的机理仍然是一个挑战,部分原因是缺乏实验性的经验检验。我已经测试了两个重要的和一般的假设,这些假设被提出来解释这种模式:空间资源异质性组合级细化。尽管存在许多其他假设,但这两个假设都建立在最新的理论和经验证据基础上,并且每个假设都检验了资源竞争理论的一个重要且基本的简化假设。本文介绍的实验和分析构成了植物生态学中长期存在的教条的第一个严格测试。与长期以来未经测试的教条相反,我发现空间资源异质性在维持物种间共存方面没有任何作用。相反,物种丰富度仅与限制资源的平均数量成正比。此外,我发现很少有证据支持资源利基分化,而有力证据表明物种丰富度首先是样本中个体数量的副产品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号