首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Simple and Rapid Extraction Procedures for the Determination of Pesticide Residues in Fruit Juices by Fast Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
【2h】

Comparison of Simple and Rapid Extraction Procedures for the Determination of Pesticide Residues in Fruit Juices by Fast Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

机译:快速气相色谱 - 质谱法快速提取果汁中农药残留的快速提取方法比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Three sample treatment methods, based on QuEChERS, solid-phase extraction (SPE) and solid-phase microextraction (SPME), were compared and evaluated in order to obtain the best conditions to determine pesticide residues in fruit juice by fast gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (single quadrupole GC-MS). Analysis were performed under selected ion monitoring, acquiring the three most abundant and/or specific ions for each analyte and using their relative intensity ratios as a confirmatory parameter. The 3 methodologies (QuEChERS, SPE and SPME) were validated taking 15 selected pesticides as model compounds, using commercial apple juice. QuEChERS procedure was based on the AOAC Official Method 2007.01, using acetonitrile (containing 1 % acetic acid) as extraction solvent and primary–secondary amine during the dispersive solid-phase extraction. Oasis hydrophilic–lipophilic balance cartridges were used for SPE, and polyacrylate fibers were used for direct immersion SPME procedure. Three isotopically labeled standards were added to the samples before extraction and used as surrogate standards. Validation parameters as recoveries, limits of detection, and limits of quantification (LOQ), as well as matrix effects and sample throughput, were obtained and compared for the three extraction procedures. QuEChERS was considered faster and led to the best quantitative results. In this way, validation was extended to up to 56 pesticides by applying QuEChERS in multi-fruit juice samples, obtaining LOQs ranging from 2 to 20 μg/L for most compounds. Accuracy and precision were evaluated by means of recovery experiments at two concentration levels (10 and 100 μg/L), obtaining recoveries between 70 and 120 % in most cases and relative standard deviations below 15 %. Finally, the QuEChERS method was applied to the analysis of commercial juices, including mango–apple, pineapple, grapefruit and orange.
机译:比较和评估了三种基于QuEChERS,固相萃取(SPE)和固相微萃取(SPME)的样品处理方法,以便获得通过快速气相色谱-质谱法测定果汁中农药残留的最佳条件(单四极杆GC-MS)。在选定的离子监控下进行分析,获取每种分析物的三个最丰富和/或特定的离子,并使用它们的相对强度比作为确认参数。使用市售苹果汁,采用15种选定农药作为模型化合物,对3种方法(QuEChERS,SPE和SPME)进行了验证。 QuEChERS程序基于AOAC官方方法2007.01,在分散固相萃取过程中使用乙腈(含1%乙酸)作为萃取溶剂,并使用伯-仲胺。 SPE使用Oasis亲水亲脂平衡盒,而SPME直接浸入聚丙烯酸酯纤维。在提取之前,将三种同位素标记的标准品添加到样品中并用作替代标准品。获得了验证参数,如回收率,检测限和定量限(LOQ),以及基质效应和样品通量,并针对三种萃取程序进行了比较。 QuEChERS被认为可以更快地获得最佳定量结果。通过这种方法,通过在多果汁样品中使用QuEChERS,将验证范围扩展至多达56种农药,大多数化合物的LOQ范围为2至20μg/ L。通过两种浓度水平(10和100μg/ L)的回收率实验评估准确性和精密度,在大多数情况下,回收率在70%至120%之间,相对标准偏差在15%以下。最后,QuEChERS方法用于分析商业果汁,包括芒果,苹果,菠萝,柚子和橙子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号