首页> 外文OA文献 >By accident: the prevention of chronic neck pain after a motor vehicle accident
【2h】

By accident: the prevention of chronic neck pain after a motor vehicle accident

机译:意外:预防机动车事故后的慢性颈痛

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Chronic neck pain is often the result of motor vehicle accidents, rear-end collisions in particular. A striking pattern of complaints often occurs after the accident. It is estimated that ca. 20% of patients with an acute neck pain episode develop chronic neck pain, also called 'chronic whiplash syndrome'. So far, studies focusing on medical predictors have not found conclusive evidence that biomedical factors contribute to the development and persistence of complaints. Bio-psychosocial models such as the Fear-Avoidance model and the Post-Traumatic Stress model seem more promising in explaining chronic complaints. The prevention of both acute and chronic pain and complaints after a motor vehicle accident is complex. Primary prevention is mostly focused on biomechanics, such as headrests and seatbelts. However, these type of studies are confronted with ethical boundaries and challenges in research. Secondary prevention seems to give promising results for two factors, being education and activation. Both factors are linked to catastrophic beliefs of patients about their pain and the possible harmfulness of being active. These catastrophic beliefs appear to be even more important when it comes to tertiary prevention, the treatment of chronic complaints after a motor vehicle accident. Catastrophic beliefs are elevated in people with chronic pain and need to be the primary target within interventions. However, research on the prevention of complaints lacks a sound theoretical framework and strong recommendations about the implementation of strategies cannot be made.
机译:慢性颈部疼痛通常是机动车事故尤其是追尾事故的结果。事故发生后,通常会出现明显的投诉模式。据估计,约。患有急性颈部疼痛发作的患者中有20%会发展成慢性颈部疼痛,也称为“慢性鞭打综合症”。到目前为止,专注于医学预测因素的研究尚未找到确凿的证据表明生物医学因素会促进投诉的发展和持续。诸如恐惧避免模型和创伤后应激模型之类的生物社会心理模型在解释慢性病方面似乎更有希望。预防机动车事故后的急性和慢性疼痛和不适很复杂。一级预防主要集中在生物力学上,例如头枕和安全带。但是,这些类型的研究面临着伦理边界和研究挑战。二级预防似乎在两个方面产生了希望的结果,即教育和激活。这两个因素都与患者关于他们的痛苦以及活跃的可能危害的灾难性信念有关。当涉及到三级预防,机动车事故后慢性病的治疗时,这些灾难性的想法似乎更为重要。患有慢性疼痛的人的灾难性信念高涨,需要成为干预措施中的主要目标。但是,关于预防投诉的研究缺乏完善的理论框架,因此无法就实施策略提出强有力的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vangronsveld Karoline;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 dut
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号