首页> 外文OA文献 >Does the load-sharing classification predict ligamentous injury, neurological injury, and the need for surgery in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures?: Clinical article.
【2h】

Does the load-sharing classification predict ligamentous injury, neurological injury, and the need for surgery in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures?: Clinical article.

机译:负荷分担分类是否预测了胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者的韧带损伤,神经损伤和手术需要?:临床文章。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECT: The load-sharing score (LSS) of vertebral body comminution is predictive of results after short-segment posterior instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Some authors have posited that an LSS u3e 6 is predictive of neurological injury, ligamentous injury, and the need for surgical intervention. However, the authors of the present study hypothesized that the LSS does not predict ligamentous or neurological injury.METHODS: The prospectively collected spinal cord injury database from a single institution was queried for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Study inclusion criteria were acute (u3c 24 hours) burst fractures between T-10 and L-2 with preoperative CT and MRI. Flexion-distraction injuries and pathological fractures were excluded. Four experienced spine surgeons determined the LSS and posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity. Neurological status was assessed from a review of the medical records.RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included in the study. There were 4 patients for whom all observers assigned an LSS u3e 6, recommending operative treatment. Eleven patients had LSSs ≤ 6 across all observers, suggesting that nonoperative treatment would be appropriate. There was moderate interobserver agreement (0.43) for the overall LSS and fair agreement (0.24) for an LSS u3e 6. Correlations between the LSS and the PLC score averaged 0.18 across all observers (range -0.02 to 0.34, p value range 0.02-0.89). Correlations between the LSS and the American Spinal Injury Association motor score averaged -0.12 across all observers (range -0.25 to -0.03, p value range 0.1-0.87). Correlations describing the relationship between an LSS u3e 6 and the treating physicianu27s decision to operate averaged 0.17 across all observers (range 0.11-0.24, p value range 0.12-0.47).CONCLUSIONS: The LSS does not uniformly correlate with the PLC injury, neurological status, or empirical clinical decision making. The LSSs of only one observer correlated significantly with PLC injury. There were no significant correlations between the LSS as determined by any observer and neurological status or clinical decision making.
机译:目的:椎体粉碎的负荷分担分数(LSS)可以预示胸腰椎爆裂骨折的短段后路手术后的结果。一些作者认为,LSS 6可以预测神经系统损伤,韧带损伤以及是否需要手术干预。然而,本研究的作者假设LSS不能预测韧带或神经损伤。方法:从一个机构前瞻性收集的脊髓损伤数据库中查询胸腰椎爆裂性骨折。研究纳入标准为术前CT和MRI在T-10和L-2之间发生急性(24小时)爆裂性骨折。排除屈曲牵张损伤和病理性骨折。四名经验丰富的脊柱外科医师确定了LSS和后韧带复合体(PLC)的完整性。通过回顾病历来评估神经系统状况。结果:44名患者被纳入研究。有4位患者的所有观察者均被分配了LSS 6,建议进行手术治疗。在所有观察者中,有11名患者的LSS≤6,这表明非手术治疗是合适的。总体LSS的观察者间一致性(0.43)和LSS的合理一致性(0.24)6。在所有观察者中,LSS和PLC得分之间的相关性平均为0.18(范围-0.02到0.34,p值范围0.02- 0.89)。 LSS与美国脊髓损伤协会运动评分之间的相关性在所有观察者中平均为-0.12(范围-0.25至-0.03,p值范围0.1-0.87)。描述LSS 6与主治医师决定手术的关系的相关性在所有观察者中平均为0.17(范围0.11-0.24,p值范围0.12-0.47)。结论:LSS与PLC损伤并不均匀相关,神经系统状况或经验性临床决策。只有一名观察者的LSS与PLC损伤显着相关。由任何观察者确定的LSS与神经系统状况或临床决策之间无显着相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号