首页> 外文OA文献 >'Bollywood' adolescents: young viewers discuss childhood, class and Hindi films
【2h】

'Bollywood' adolescents: young viewers discuss childhood, class and Hindi films

机译:“宝莱坞”青少年:年轻的观众讨论童年,课堂和印地语电影

摘要

Historically the issue of class has been seen to be of overt significance in structuring narratives and representations of young people in the Romantic genre in Hindi cinema, and in the last few decades representations of class have altered almost beyond recognition. In the 1970s, young heroes or heroines tended to be poor, from single-parent families or impoverished areas.1 Malhotra and Alagh argue that depictions of class in these films are tied to an ethics-driven postcolonial vision: “wealth was linked directly to the corrupt, exploitative and dissolute world of old money or the landowning classes who aligned themselves with the colonial masters” (2004, 25). The 1990s saw a superfi cially comical shift. Released in 1994, after the dramatic liberalisation of the Indian economy (Fernandes 2000a and 2000b), Hum Aapke Hain Koun (HAHK: Who am I to you? dir. Sooraj Barjatya) is set in an elite Indiaudof fast cars and brand-names, while its heroines possess the traits of docile, traditional Indian daughters-in-law. It depicts as commonplace the everyday reality of a miniscule elite (Saldanha 2002, 341). Subsequent family melodramas placed commercial culture centre-stage, with teenage heroes driving convertibles, wearing branded clothing and jetting off in private helicopters to million-dollar apartments. A viewer in Rao’s ethnography (2007, 64) comments: “If someone makes a fi lm where the hero is not rich then they call it an alternative fi lm. Why is a film about a poor man alternative in India? Majority of Indians are poor!” Saliently, noting the films’ resonance with political propaganda of neoliberal and far-right religious-political elites, textual accounts of this era of Hindi cinema deplore commercial films as depoliticising, capitalist fantasies (Bharucha 1995; Juluri 1999).
机译:从历史上看,阶级问题在印地语电影中浪漫派流派的年轻人的叙事和表征的结构中具有明显的意义,并且在最近的几十年中,阶级的表现几乎已经改变,已经面目全非。在1970年代,年轻的英雄或女英雄往往来自单亲家庭或贫困地区。1。Malhotra和Alagh认为,这些电影中的阶级描写与道德驱动的后殖民愿景联系在一起:“财富直接与腐败,剥削和放荡的旧钱世界或与殖民统治者保持一致的地主阶级”(2004年,第25页)。 1990年代发生了表面上漫画上的转变。于1994年发布,在印度经济急剧自由化之后(Fernandes 2000a和2000b),Hum Aapke Hain Koun(HAHK:我对你是谁?目录:Sooraj Barjatya)位于印度 udof快速车和名牌中,名字,而女主人公则具有温顺的特点,即传统的印度s妇。它描绘了微不足道精英的日常现实(Saldanha 2002,341)。随后的家庭戏剧将商业文化置于中心位置,十几岁的英雄驾驶敞篷车,穿着品牌的衣服,并乘坐私人直升机直奔百万美元的公寓。饶(Rao)的人种志(2007,64)中的一位观众评论说:“如果有人在英雄不富裕的地方制作电影,那么他们就称其为替代电影。为什么要在印度拍摄一部关于穷人的电影?多数印度人都很贫穷!”值得注意的是,注意到电影对新自由主义和极右翼宗教政治精英的政治宣传的共鸣,印地语电影时代的文字记载将商业电影视为去政治化,资本主义幻想(Bharucha 1995; Juluri 1999)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Banaji Shakuntala;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号