首页> 外文OA文献 >How can the Community of Enquiry (CoE) methodology be used to help make the decision making processes of a school managment team (SMT) in South Africa more inclusive, democratic, effective and collaborative?
【2h】

How can the Community of Enquiry (CoE) methodology be used to help make the decision making processes of a school managment team (SMT) in South Africa more inclusive, democratic, effective and collaborative?

机译:如何使用调查社区(CoE)方法来帮助使南非学校管理团队(SMT)的决策过程更具包容性,民主性,有效性和协作性?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An authoritarian and bureaucratic ethos adopted by South African Schools prior to 1994 continues to be adopted in many schools. It may be assumed that with the advent of the new South African democratic government in 1994 there would be more freedom given to schools to adopt different leadership styles that were relevant to their school context. Given the top-down culture and authoritarian leadership structures of schools that were designed and developed during the apartheid era, secondary school principals and school management teams have struggled to adopt a more democratic approach to running a school since 1994. In the previous dispensation, school decision making was mostly not a collective effort, and involved a minimum of consultation and sharing of ideas, with staff not being seen as having the role or potential to positively influence significant school decisions. The national Department of Education (2003) refers to this as “… the entrenched bureaucratic and hierarchical management practices inherited from apartheid traditions.” However, greater choice and autonomy of thought are part and parcel of the democratic paradigm.udA comprehensive literature review on the Community of Enquiry (CoE) methodology, a resource developed by Matthew Lipman, revealed a more open and inclusive approach to thinking together and embraces the principals of choice and autonomy. It is proposed that this methodology could be used to help school management teams (SMTs) become more collaborative and democratic in their approach to decision-making. Particular attention will be paid to the democratic values that underpin a CoE, in particular the values of equality, justice and freedom will be discussed with specific reference to the South African context.udBureaucratic, autocratic and democratic leadership styles may be adopted by the SMTs in various schools and each leadership style could influence the decision making process as well as the culture within a school.udThe CoE methodology could work in conjunction with a democratic leadership style to allow SMTs to be more collaborative and inclusive in the decision making process.
机译:1994年之前,南非学校采用的专制和官僚主义风气在许多学校中继续被采用。可以假设,随着1994年新的南非民主政府的到来,将赋予学校更多的自由,使他们能够采用与他们的学校背景相关的不同领导风格。鉴于种族隔离时代设计和发展的自上而下的学校文化和威权主义的领导结构,自1994年以来,中学校长和学校管理团队一直在努力采用更民主的方法来办学。决策主要不是集体努力,而是最少地进行咨询和思想交流,而员工并未被视为具有对重大学校决策产生积极影响的作用或潜力。国家教育部(2003)将此称为“……从种族隔离传统继承的根深蒂固的官僚和等级管理做法。”但是,更多的选择和思想自治是民主范式的重要组成部分。 ud马修顿·利普曼(Matthew Lipman)开发的关于探究社区(CoE)方法论的综合文献综述揭示了一种更加开放和包容的方法来共同思考和思考。包含选择和自治原则。建议该方法可用于帮助学校管理团队(SMT)在决策方法上变得更加协作和民主。将特别注意支持欧洲委员会的民主价值观,尤其是将特别参照南非的情况讨论平等,正义和自由的价值观。 udSMT可以采用官僚,专制和民主的领导风格在不同的学校中,每种领导风格都可能影响决策过程以及学校的文化。 udCoE方法可以与民主领导风格结合使用,以使SMT在决策过程中更具协作性和包容性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Marriott Hassiena;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号