首页> 外文OA文献 >Harmonisasi Indikator Kinerja Undip (Iku) dengan Kriteria World Class University Qs World Rankings
【2h】

Harmonisasi Indikator Kinerja Undip (Iku) dengan Kriteria World Class University Qs World Rankings

机译:世界一流大学Qs世界排名标准协调未完成绩效指标(Iku)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Harmonization of Undip Performance Indicators to World Class University QS World Ranking Criteria – Undip Performance Indicators is an important parts of the Undip strategic plan which has a function as an Undip success parameter over a period of leadership is considered inefficient yet seen from continue to decline Undip\u27s rank both national and Internationally. With increased competition between universities, Undip must be able to demonstrate the competitiveness both nationally and globally one of them to become a World Class University (WCU). However, during this Undip Performance Indicators has never been compared with the assessment criteria of World Class University. Seeing this, the research is going to harmonize Undip Performance Indicators with one WCU assessment criteria which have been recognized Internationally, QS World University Ranking by Delphi approach and determine the importance weight of each assessment criteria of QS World University Ranking by AHP method. Based on research, there are 15 Undip Performance Indicators that are not aligned with the QS, and there are 17 sub-criteria QS are not aligned with the Undip Performance Indicators. Internationalization is the assestment criteria with the highest weight in comparison with 13 other QS assessment criteria. The proposed recommendation is to do the grouping indicators into indicators of priority and non-priority.
机译:Undip绩效指标与世界一流大学QS的世界排名标准保持一致-Undip绩效指标是Undip战略计划的重要组成部分,在领导力时期,其作为Undip成功参数起作用,被认为效率低下,但从持续下降中可以看出Undip在国内和国际上都排名第一。随着大学之间竞争的加剧,Undip必须能够在全国和全球范围内展现其竞争力,成为世界一流大学(WCU)。但是,在此期间,未将绩效指标与世界一流大学的评估标准进行了比较。鉴于此,研究将使Undip绩效指标与国际公认的WCU评估标准,Delphi方法对QS世界大学排名的评估相一致,并通过AHP方法确定QS世界大学排名的每个评估标准的重要性。根据研究,有15个不符合QS的未完成绩效指标,还有17个子标准QS与不符合QS的不一致。与其他13个QS评估标准相比,国际化是权重最高的评估标准。拟议的建议是将指标分为优先和非优先指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号