首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Multiple sets and Single set of Resistance Training on Muscle Strength and Power
【2h】

Comparison of Multiple sets and Single set of Resistance Training on Muscle Strength and Power

机译:多组和单组阻力训练对肌肉力量和力量的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Studies have been conducted to investigate the effects of different resistance training modalities on muscle strength and power in order to improve physical performance, yet to date findings have been inconclusive. Optimal resistance programs for muscular responses to high and low volume resistance training still need to be explored. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of multiple sets (70% of 1RM, 3 sets/10 reps) and a single set (50-100% of 1RM, 1 set/up to 8 reps) of resistance training on muscular strength and power in healthy male college students. A total of 19 students were randomly assigned to either a single set (ST, n=6), multiple sets (MT, n=7), or control group (CON, n=6). The ST (every 3rd day) and MT (3 times/week) trained for 8 weeks using an inclined leg press. The ST training protocol consists of one set of eight maximum number of repetitions using 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% of 1RM for the first four repetitions, then needed 10 lbs were added to each subsequent repetition until they failed to lift the weight. Total volume of ST was 147 reps (average 7 reps x 21 days), and MT was 720 reps (30 reps x 24 days). One-repetition maximum (1RM), muscle maximal voluntary contraction, peak power, and electromyography were measured at baseline and after 8 weeks of training. Repeated-measured ANOVAs were used to find interaction effect between trial and treatment groups factors. 1RM in all training groups was significantly increased compared to their baseline values (p u3c .001). There was no significant difference in 1RM between the two training groups after 8 weeks of training. Muscle maximal voluntary contraction (p u3c .001) and electromyography activity (p = .043) were significantly increased in MT after 8 weeks of training compared to baseline, but not in ST (p = .089 and p = .206, respectively). There was no significant increase on peak power after 8 weeks of resistance training both in MT (p = .286) and ST (p = .372). ST, a low volume progressive single set resistance training protocol, is as effective as traditional high volume multi sets training protocol (MT) for increasing muscle strength.
机译:为了改善身体机能,已经进行了研究以研究不同的阻力训练方式对肌肉力量和力量的影响,但迄今为止,结论尚无定论。仍然需要探索针对高容量和低容量阻力训练的肌肉反应的最佳阻力程序。这项研究的目的是比较多组阻力训练对肌肉的影响(1RM的70%,3组/ 10次)和单组(1RM的50-100%,1组/最多8次)健康的男大学生的力量和力量。总共19名学生被随机分配到一个单独的小组(ST,n = 6),多个集合(MT,n = 7)或对照组(CON,n = 6)。 ST(每3天)和MT(每星期3次)使用斜腿推举训练了8周。 ST训练协议包括一组八个最大重复次数,前四个重复使用1RM的50%,75%,90%和100%,然后在随后的每个重复中添加10磅,直到它们无法举起重量。 ST的总体积为147次(平均7次x 21天),MT为720次(30次x 24天)。在基线和训练8周后测量一次最大重复运动(1RM),最大肌肉自主收缩,峰值功率和肌电图。重复测量的方差分析用于发现试验和治疗组因素之间的相互作用。与基线值相比,所有训练组的1RM均显着增加(p u3c .001)。训练8周后,两个训练组之间的1RM没有明显差异。与基线相比,训练8周后MT的肌肉最大自发性收缩(p u3c .001)和肌电图活动(p = .043)显着增加,而ST组则没有(分别为.089和p = .206) )。在MT(p = .286)和ST(p = .372)中进行了8周的阻力训练后,峰值功率没有明显增加。 ST是一种小容量渐进式单组阻力训练方案,与传统的大容量多套阻力训练方案(MT)一样有效,可以增加肌肉力量。

著录项

  • 作者

    hong junyoung;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号