Randomized search heuristics are a broadly used class of general-purpose algorithms. Analyzing them via classical methods of theoretical computer science is a growing field. While several strong runtime bounds exist, a powerful complexity theory for such algorithms is yet to be developed. We contribute to this goal in several aspects. In a first step, we analyze existing black-box complexity models. Our results indicate that these models are not restrictive enough. This remains true if we restrict the memory of the algorithms under consideration. These results motivate us to enrich the existing notions of black-box complexity by the additional restriction that not actual objective values, but only the relative quality of the previously evaluated solutions may be taken into account by the algorithms. Many heuristics belong to this class of algorithms. We show that our ranking-based model gives more realistic complexity estimates for some problems, while for others the low complexities of the previous models still hold. Surprisingly, our results have an interesting game-theoretic aspect as well.We show that analyzing the black-box complexity of the OneMaxn function class—a class often regarded to analyze how heuristics progress in easy parts of the search space—is the same as analyzing optimal winning strategies for the generalized Mastermind game with 2 colors and length-n codewords. This connection was seemingly overlooked so far in the search heuristics community.
展开▼
