首页> 外文OA文献 >Differences in the impacts of formal and informal recreational trails on urban forest loss and tree structure
【2h】

Differences in the impacts of formal and informal recreational trails on urban forest loss and tree structure

机译:正式和非正式休闲径对城市森林流失和树木结构影响的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recreational trails are one of the most common types of infrastructure used for nature-based activities such as hiking and mountain biking worldwide. Depending on their design, location, construction, maintenance and use, these trails differ in their environmental impacts. There are few studies, however, comparing the impacts of different trail types including between formal management-created trails and informal visitor-created trails. Although both types of trails can be found in remote natural areas, dense networks of them often occur in forests close to cities where they experience intense visitor use. To assess the relative impacts of different recreational trails in urban forests, we compared the condition of the trail surface, loss of forest strata and changes in tree structure caused by seven types of trails (total network 46.1 km) traversing 17 remnants of an endangered urban forest in Australia. After mapping and classifying all trails, we assessed their impact on the forest condition at 125 sites (15 sites per trail type, plus 15 control sites within undisturbed forest). On the trail sites, the condition of the trail surface, distance from the trail edge to four forest strata (litter, understory, midstorey and tree cover) and structure of the tree-line were assessed. Informal trails generally had poorer surface conditions and were poorly-designed and located. Per site, formal and informal trails resulted in similar loss of forest strata, with wider trails resulting in greater loss of forest. Because there were more informal trails, however, they accounted for the greatest cumulative forest loss. Structural impacts varied, with the widest informal trails and all formal hardened trails resulting in similar reductions in canopy cover and tree density but an increase in saplings. These structural impacts are likely a function of the unregulated and intense use of large informal trails, and disturbance from the construction and maintenance of formal trails. The results demonstrate that different types of recreational trails vary in the type and range of impacts they cause to forests. They highlight the importance of careful consideration towards management options when dealing with trail networks especially in areas of high conservation value.
机译:娱乐步道是用于世界各地远足和山地自行车等基于自然的活动的最常见基础设施类型之一。根据它们的设计,位置,构造,维护和使用,这些路径对环境的影响是不同的。但是,很少有研究比较不同类型的足迹的影响,包括在正式管理创建的足迹和非正式访客创建的足迹之间的影响。尽管两种类型的步道都可以在偏远的自然地区找到,但它们密集的网络经常出现在靠近城市的森林中,那里游客频繁使用。为了评估城市森林中不同休闲小径的相对影响,我们比较了七种类型的小径(总网长46.1公里)横穿濒危城市的17个残余物而造成的小径表面状况,森林地层损失和树木结构变化在澳大利亚的森林。在对所有路径进行映射和分类之后,我们评估了它们对125个站点(每个路径类型15个站点,外加未扰动森林内的15个控制站点)对森林状况的影响。在小径站点,评估了小径表面的状况,从小径边缘到四个森林地层(凋落物,林下层,中层和树木覆盖物)的距离以及林线的结构。非正式小径通常具有较差的地面条件,并且设计和定位不当。在每个站点上,正式和非正式路径都导致了类似的森林地层损失,而路径越宽,森林的损失就越多。但是,由于存在更多的非正式线索,因此它们造成了最大的累计森林损失。结构影响各不相同,其中非正式的步道最宽,所有正式的硬化步道也导致类似的树冠覆盖率和树木密度降低,但幼树数量增加。这些结构性影响可能是由于对大型非正式步道的无节制和大量使用以及正式步道的建设和维护造成的干扰。结果表明,不同类型的休闲小径对森林造成的影响的类型和范围不同。它们强调了在处理足迹网络(尤其是在具有高保护价值的地区)时,认真考虑管理选项的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号