首页> 外文OA文献 >Is the infant car seat challenge useful?:A pilot study in a simulated moving vehicle
【2h】

Is the infant car seat challenge useful?:A pilot study in a simulated moving vehicle

机译:挑战婴儿汽车安全座椅是否有用?:在模拟移动车辆中进行的一项初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and Objective: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends preterm infants complete a pre-discharge “car seat challenge” observation for cardiorespiratory compromise whilst in a car seat. This static challenge does not consider the more upright position in a car or the vibration of the seat when the car is moving. This pilot study was designed to assess the cardiorespiratory effects of vibration, mimicking the effect of being in a moving car, on preterm and term infants.Methods: A simulator was designed to reproduce vertical vibration similar to that in a rear facing car seat at 30mph. 19 healthy newborn term and 21 preterm infants, ready for hospital discharge, underwent cardiorespiratory measurements whilst lying flat in a cot (baseline), static in the seat (30°), simulator (40°) and during motion (vibration 40°). Results: Median test age was 13 days (range 1- 65 days), and median weight was 2.5Kg [iqr: 2.1-3.1Kg]. Compared to baseline observations, only the total number of desaturations was significantly increased when infants were placed at 30° (p=0.03). At 40°, or with vibration, respiratory and heart rates increased and oxygen saturation decreased significantly. Profound desaturations 85% significantly increased during motion, regardless of gestational age.Conclusions: This is the first study to assess the effect of motion on infants seated in a car safety seat. Term and preterm infants showed significant signs of potentially adverse cardiorespiratory effects in the upright position at 40° particularly with simulated motion; not identified in the standard challenge. A larger study is required to investigate the significance of these results.
机译:背景与目的:美国儿科学会建议早产儿坐在汽车安全座椅时,应完成出院前“汽车安全座椅挑战”观察,以发现心肺功能受损。这种静态挑战不考虑汽车在移动中处于更直立的位置或座椅的振动。这项初步研究旨在评估振动对心肺功能的影响,模仿在动车中对早产和足月婴儿的影响方法:设计了一个模拟器,以模拟垂直振动,类似于30mph朝后的汽车座椅。 19名健康的足月新生儿和21例早产儿,准备出院,对他们进行心肺测量,同时将它们平躺在婴儿床(基线),静坐(30°),模拟器(40°)和运动(振动40°)期间。结果:测试年龄中位数为13天(范围为1至65天),体重中位数为2.5Kg [iqr:2.1-3.1Kg]。与基线观察相比,将婴儿置于30°时,仅去饱和总数明显增加(p = 0.03)。在40°或振动下,呼吸和心率增加,血氧饱和度显着下降。不论胎龄如何,在运动过程中明显的去饱和度均<85%明显增加。结论:这是第一项评估运动对坐在汽车安全座椅上的婴儿的影响的研究。足月和早产儿在40°直立位置表现出明显的潜在心肺呼吸作用的明显迹象,特别是在模拟运动下;在标准挑战中未标识。需要进行更大的研究以调查这些结果的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号