首页> 外文OA文献 >Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study.
【2h】

Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study.

机译:Eculizumab在抗乙酰胆碱受体抗体阳性的难治性重症肌无力(REGAIN)中的安全性和有效性:3期,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照,多中心研究。

摘要

Background Complement is likely to have a role in refractory generalised myasthenia gravis, but no approved therapiesudspecifically target this system. Results from a phase 2 study suggested that eculizumab, a terminal complementudinhibitor, produced clinically meaningful improvements in patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positiveudrefractory generalised myasthenia gravis. We further assessed the efficacy and safety of eculizumab in this patientudpopulation in a phase 3 trial.udMethods We did a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (REGAIN) in 76 hospitalsudand specialised clinics in 17 countries across North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia. Eligible patients wereudaged at least 18 years, with a Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score of 6 or more, MyastheniaudGravis Foundation of America (MGFA) class II–IV disease, vaccination against Neisseria meningitides, and previousudtreatment with at least two immunosuppressive therapies or one immunosuppressive therapy and chronic intravenousudimmunoglobulin or plasma exchange for 12 months without symptom control. Patients with a history of thymoma orudthymic neoplasms, thymectomy within 12 months before screening, or use of intravenous immunoglobulin or plasmaudexchange within 4 weeks before randomisation, or rituximab within 6 months before screening, were excluded. Weudrandomly assigned participants (1:1) to either intravenous eculizumab or intravenous matched placebo for 26 weeks.udDosing for eculizumab was 900 mg on day 1 and at weeks 1, 2, and 3; 1200 mg at week 4; and 1200 mg given everyudsecond week thereafter as maintenance dosing. Randomisation was done centrally with an interactive voice or webresponseudsystem with patients stratified to one of four groups based on MGFA disease classification. Where possible,udpatients were maintained on existing myasthenia gravis therapies and rescue medication was allowed at the studyudphysician’s discretion. Patients, investigators, staff, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment assignment. Theudprimary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline to week 26 in MG-ADL total score measured by worst-rankudANCOVA. The efficacy population set was defined as all patients randomly assigned to treatment groups who receivedudat least one dose of study drug, had a valid baseline MG-ADL assessment, and at least one post-baseline MG-ADLudassessment. The safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients who received eculizumab or placebo. This trialudis registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01997229.udFindings Between April 30, 2014, and Feb 19, 2016, we randomly assigned and treated 125 patients, 62 with eculizumabudand 63 with placebo. The primary analysis showed no significant difference between eculizumab and placebo (leastsquaresudmean rank 56·6 [SEM 4·5] vs 68·3 [4·5]; rank-based treatment difference −11·7, 95% CI −24·3 to 0·96;udp=0·0698). No deaths or cases of meningococcal infection occurred during the study. The most common adverseudevents in both groups were headache and upper respiratory tract infection (ten [16%] for both events in the eculizumabudgroup and 12 [19%] for both in the placebo group). Myasthenia gravis exacerbations were reported by six (10%) patientsudin the eculizumab group and 15 (24%) in the placebo group. Six (10%) patients in the eculizumab group and 12 (19%)udin the placebo group required rescue therapy.udInterpretation The change in the MG-ADL score was not statistically significant between eculizumab and placebo, asudmeasured by the worst-rank analysis. Eculizumab was well tolerated. The use of a worst-rank analytical approachudproved to be an important limitation of this study since the secondary and sensitivity analyses results were inconsistentudwith the primary endpoint resu further research into the role of complement is needed.
机译:背景补体可能在难治性广义重症肌无力中起作用,但尚无批准的疗法针对该系统。来自2期研究的结果表明,依库丽单抗是一种终末补体 udin抑制剂,在抗乙酰胆碱受体抗体阳性难治性广义重症肌无力患者中产生了临床上有意义的改善。我们在一项3期临床试验中进一步评估了依库丽单抗在该患者中的疗效和安全性。 udMethods我们在76家医院 udand专门诊所中进行了一项3期,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照,多中心研究(REGAIN)遍布北美,拉丁美洲,欧洲和亚洲的17个国家/地区。符合条件的患者年龄至少18岁,其重症肌无力日常生活活动(MG-ADL)得分为6或更高,美国重症肌无力基金会(MGFA)II-IV级疾病,针对脑膜炎奈瑟菌的疫苗接种,以及之前至少用两种免疫抑制疗法或一种免疫抑制疗法治疗和慢性静脉内 udimmunoglobulin或血浆置换治疗12个月而无症状控制。有胸腺瘤或胸腺瘤病史,筛查前12个月内进行胸腺切除术,或在随机分组前4周内使用静脉免疫球蛋白或血浆 udexchange或筛查前6个月内使用利妥昔单抗的患者被排除在外。我们将参与者(1:1)随机分配到静脉依库珠单抗或静脉内匹配的安慰剂中,持续26周。 ud依库珠单抗的剂量在第1天和第1、2和3周为900 mg;第4周1200毫克;此后每两周给1200毫克,作为维持剂量。使用交互式语音或网络响应 udsystem集中进行随机分组,根据MGFA疾病分类将患者分为四组之一。在可能的情况下,根据研究人员的判断,对患者进行现有的重症肌无力治疗,并允许急救药物。患者,研究人员,工作人员和结果评估者都被掩盖了治疗分配。主要疗效终点是从基线到第26周的MG-ADL总评分的变化(以最差排名 udANCOVA衡量)。疗效人群集定义为随机分配至治疗组的所有患者,接受至少一剂研究药物,具有有效的基线MG-ADL评估和至少一项基线后MG-ADL /评估。安全性分析包括所有接受依库丽单抗或安慰剂治疗的随机分配患者。该试验临床试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号NCT01997229。 udFindings。在2014年4月30日至2016年2月19日之间,我们随机分配并治疗了125例患者,其中62例患者使用依库珠单抗 udd,63例患者使用安慰剂。初步分析显示依库丽单抗和安慰剂之间无显着差异(最小二乘 udmean等级56·6 [SEM 4·5] vs 68·3 [4·5];基于等级的治疗差异-11·7,95%CI -24 ·3到0·96; udp = 0·0698)。在研究过程中未发生死亡或脑膜炎球菌感染病例。两组中最常见的不良事件是头痛和上呼吸道感染(依库丽单抗组两个事件均为10 [16%],安慰剂组均为12 [19%])。据报道,依库丽单抗组有6名(10%)乌迪内加重症患者,安慰剂组有15名(24%)。依库丽单抗组中有6名(10%)患者和安慰剂组中有12例(19%) ud患者需要抢救治疗。 ud释义 uculizumab与安慰剂之间MG-ADL评分的变化在统计学上无统计学意义,等级分析。依库丽单抗耐受性良好。事实证明,使用最差分析方法是该研究的重要局限性,因为次要和敏感性分析结果与主要终点结果不一致。需要进一步研究补体的作用。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号