首页> 外文OA文献 >Biculturalism in Employee Selection or 'Who Should Get the Job'? Perceptions of Maori and Pakeha Job Applicants in a NZ European Student Sample
【2h】

Biculturalism in Employee Selection or 'Who Should Get the Job'? Perceptions of Maori and Pakeha Job Applicants in a NZ European Student Sample

机译:员工选择中的双文化主义或“谁应该得到工作”?新西兰欧洲学生样本中毛利人和帕克哈求职者的看法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The current study reports an experiment assessing how Pakeha/European New Zealanders' perceptions of job applicants are shaped by ethnicity, merit and need. A sample of 114 undergraduate students viewed the curricula vitae of both high and low merit New Zealand European/Pakeha and Maori job applicants. Individual versus group need was made salient before participants provided general ratings and recommended salaries for the job applicants. Participants provided more positive assessments of high merit Maori than high merit New Zealand European/Pakeha applicants, but less favourable assessments of low merit Maori in comparison to low merit New Zealand European/Pakeha applicants. This trend was also observed for recommended salaries, but only if individual need was made salient. The implications for employee selection, Affirmative Action policies, and attitudes towards biculturalism in general are discussed.
机译:当前的研究报告了一项实验,评估了Pakeha /欧洲新西兰人对求职者的看法是如何受到种族,优点和需求的影响的。来自114名本科生的样本查看了新西兰欧洲/ Pakeha和毛利人求职者的高低履历。在参与者为求职者提供总体评分和推荐薪水之前,要先确定个人需求还是群体需求。参加者对高毛利毛利人的评价比对高毛利新西兰欧洲/ Pakeha申请人的评价要高,但对低毛利毛利人的评价则低于对低毛利新西兰欧洲/ Pakeha要求的评价。对于推荐的薪水也观察到了这种趋势,但是只有当个人需要变得很显着时。讨论了对员工选择,平权行动政策以及对双文化主义态度的总体含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号