首页> 外文OA文献 >'Revolution? What Revolution?' Successes and limits of computing technologies in philosophy and religion
【2h】

'Revolution? What Revolution?' Successes and limits of computing technologies in philosophy and religion

机译:“革命?什么革命?”计算技术在哲学和宗教领域的成功与局限

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Computing technologies like other technological innovations in the modern West are inevitably introduced with the rhetoric of "revolution". Especially during the 1980s (the PC revolution) and 1990s (the Internet and Web revolutions), enthusiasts insistently celebrated radical changes— changes ostensibly inevitable and certainly as radical as those brought about by the invention of the printing press, if not the discovery of fire.udThese enthusiasms now seem very "1990s�—in part as the revolution stumbled with the dot.com failures and the devastating impacts of 9/11. Moreover, as I will sketch out below, the patterns of diffusion and impact in philosophy and religion show both tremendous success, as certain revolutionary promises are indeed kept—as well as (sometimes spectacular) failures. Perhaps we use revolutionary rhetoric less frequently because the revolution has indeed succeeded: computing technologies, and many of the powers and potentials they bring us as scholars and religionists have become so ubiquitous and normal that they no longer seem "revolutionary at all. At the same time, many of the early hopes and promises instantiated in such specific projects as Artificial Intelligence and anticipations of virtual religious communities only have been dashed against the apparently intractable limits of even these most remarkable technologies. While these failures are usually forgotten they leave in their wake a clearer sense of what these new technologies can, and cannot do.
机译:像现代西方其他技术创新一样,不可避免地会引入“革命”的口号。尤其是在1980年代(个人计算机革命)和1990年代(互联网和网络革命)期间,发烧友们坚持要求进行根本性的改变-表面上不可避免的变化,当然也和印刷机的发明所带来的变化一样巨大,即使不是发现印刷机。 ud这些热情现在看起来非常“ 1990年代”,部分原因是革命因dot.com失败和9/11的毁灭性影响而跌跌撞撞。此外,正如我在下文中概述的那样,传播方式哲学和宗教的影响都显示出巨大的成功,因为确实保留了某些革命性的诺言–以及(有时是壮观的)失败。也许我们较少使用革命性的言论,因为革命确实取得了成功:计算技术,以及许多他们作为学者和宗教家带给我们的力量和潜力已经变得如此普遍和普遍,以至于它们似乎不再是“革命性的”。同时,在诸如人工智能和虚拟宗教社区的预期之类的特定项目中实例化的许多早期希望和诺言,甚至与这些最杰出的技术的看似难以克服的局限相撞。尽管通常会忘记这些失败,但它们使他们对这些新技术可以做什么和不能做什么有更清晰的认识。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ess Charles;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号