首页> 外文OA文献 >短距離走競技者のステップタイプに応じた100 m レース中の加速局面の疾走動態
【2h】

短距離走競技者のステップタイプに応じた100 m レース中の加速局面の疾走動態

机译:根据短跑运动员的步阶类型,在100m比赛中加速阶段的短跑动力学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to clarify the step characteristics during the acceleration phase (0—30 m) of a 100-m sprint with reference to the step-type of sprinters. 59 male collegiate sprinters (season best time: 10.68±0.22 s) were recorded running in 100-m races using 10 high-speed video cameras (300 fps). The step variables, such as step-frequency (SF), step-length (SL), contact time, and flight time of each step in the acceleration phase (0—30 m) and maximum speed phase (30—60 m) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to classify the subjects according to step-type as indicators for the ratio of SF and SL in the 30—60 m section. In addition, each of the step-type groups was divided into two sub-groups (good and poor sprinters) according to the mean speed in the 30—60 m section. The main results were as follows: (1) Sprinters were classifiable into 3 step-type groups; SL-type (n=22), SF-type (n=24), and Mid-type (n=13). (2) Among these groups, there were no differences in the 100-m race times and mean speeds during the 0—30, 30—60, and 60—100 m sections, although SL-type sprinters were taller and had a higher SLindex than SF-type sprinters. SF-type sprinters took a larger numbers of steps over the 100-m distance and showed a higher SFindex than SL-type and Mid-type sprinters. (3) In the 0—30 m and 30—60 m sections, the contact and flight times of SL-type sprinters were longer than those of SF-type sprinters. (4) In SL-type sprinters, the SF of good sprinters was higher than that of poor sprinters at the 5th step, and the SL of good sprinters was longer than that of poor sprinters from the 7th to 15th steps, and in the 30—60 m section. (5) SF-type sprinters showed no significant differences in the SL, but the SF of good sprinters was higher than that of poor sprinters from the 7th to 16th steps and in the 30—60 m section. These results indicate that there are differences in step characteristics during the acceleration phase according to step-type, and that the step characteristics during the acceleration phase may affect the acceleration ability needed to develop a maximum sprint speed. These findings could be useful for devising training methods for improvement of 100-m sprint performance according to step-type.
机译:这项研究的目的是根据短跑运动员的步阶类型来阐明100米短跑运动员在加速阶段(0-30 m)的步阶特征。使用10台高速摄像机(300 fps),在100 m比赛中记录了59名男性大学短跑运动员(赛季最佳时间:10.68±0.22 s)。加速阶段(0-30 m)和最大速度阶段(30-60 m)中每个步骤的步长变量,例如步频(SF),步长(SL),接触时间和飞行时间为计算。聚类分析用于根据步长类型对受试者进行分类,作为30-60 m剖面中SF和SL比率的指标。另外,根据30-60 m区域的平均速度,每个阶梯型组都分为两个子组(好短跑运动员)。主要研究结果如下:(1)短跑运动员可分为3个阶梯型组。 SL型(n = 22),SF型(n = 24)和中型(n = 13)。 (2)在这些组中,尽管SL型短跑运动员身高较高且SL指数较高,但在0-30、30-60和60-100 m区间中100 m比赛时间和平均速度没有差异。比SF型短跑选手SF型短跑运动员在100米的距离上走了很多步,并且比SL型和Mid型短跑运动员表现出更高的SFindex。 (3)在0-30 m和30-60 m区间,SL型短跑运动员的接触和飞行时间长于SF型短跑运动员。 (4)在SL型短跑运动员中,第5步的优秀短跑运动员的SF高于不良短跑运动员的SF,从第7步到第15步以及第30步中,优秀的短跑运动员的SL较长于不良的短跑运动员的SF。 — 60 m部分。 (5)SF型短跑运动员在SL上没有显着差异,但是从第7步到第16步以及在30-60 m区域中,优秀短跑运动员的SF高于不良短跑运动员的SF。这些结果表明,根据阶段类型,加速阶段的阶跃特性存在差异,并且加速阶段的阶跃特性可能会影响开发最大冲刺速度所需的加速能力。这些发现可能对设计训练方法以根据步长类型改善100米短跑成绩很有帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号