首页> 外文OA文献 >Environmental activism, environmental politics, and representation: the framing of the british environmental activist movement
【2h】

Environmental activism, environmental politics, and representation: the framing of the british environmental activist movement

机译:环境激进​​主义,环境政治和代表制:英国环境激进主义运动的框架

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis explores the relationship between environmental activism, environmental politics and the mainstream media. In exploring the power relations between government, activists and the media, this work draws on Foucauldian theories of governmentality, power and space (heterotopia). The central hypothesis is that environmental politics has witnessed a shift in power away from activism and towards environmental governance and free-market economics, nestled in a media discourse that has depoliticised many environmental activist movements. Foucault’s theories on power, biopower and governmentality are combined with a critical discourse analysis (CDA) of newspaper reports and original empirical research derived from a focus group with environmental activists. The empirical data and analysis provides original knowledge on relations between environmental activists and journalists. The premise that economics has become the dominant solution to the detriment of environmental activism movements is argued through a historical analysis of advanced liberal governments’ role in creating new green markets and instruments (‘green governmentality’ in Luke’s terms). The shift towards green governmentality has been accompanied by an increased application of state measures, from legislation and surveillance, to conflating environmental activism with terrorism, and the neologism of eco-terrorism. Journalists reaffirm such governance, and the critical discourse analysis charts the shift from positive to negative reporting in the mainstream media. However, activists also contest such power relations through social and new media, alongside traditional repertoires of protest within the space of activism, to challenge such advanced liberal discourse, and bypass traditional media practices.udAs neoliberalism has increasingly become the main position in environmental politics, it places activism into a discourse of deviance. The activists’ movement counters this measure through new media, liminoid practices and repertoires of protest.
机译:本文探讨了环境行动主义,环境政治与主流媒体之间的关系。在探索政府,活动家和媒体之间的权力关系时,这项工作借鉴了福柯尔的政府性,权力和空间理论(异视症)。中心假设是,环境政治见证了权力从行动主义转向环境治理和自由市场经济学的转移,其所依托的媒体话语使许多环境行动主义者的运动政治化。福柯关于权力,生物权力和政府性的理论与报纸报道的批评性话语分析(CDA)以及源于环境活动家的焦点小组的原始经验研究相结合。经验数据和分析提供了有关环保主义者与记者之间关系的原始知识。通过对先进的自由政府在创造新的绿色市场和工具(以卢克的说法为“绿色政府”)中的作用进行的历史分析,论证了经济学已成为不利于环境行动主义运动的主要解决方案的前提。向绿色政府的转变伴随着越来越多的国家措施的应用,从立法和监督,到将环境行动主义与恐怖主义,以及生态恐怖主义的新词混为一谈。记者重申了这种治理,而批评性话语分析显示了主流媒体从正面报道到负面报道的转变。但是,激进主义者还通过社会和新媒体,与激进主义空间内的传统抗议活动进行竞争,以挑战这种先进的自由主义话语,并绕开传统媒体实践。 ud随着新自由主义日益成为环境政治中的主要地位,它会将行动主义置于偏离的话语中。激进分子的运动通过新媒体,类股活动和抗议活动来反击这一措施。

著录项

  • 作者

    Newlands Maxine;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号