首页> 外文OA文献 >Nonlinear and Fault-tolerant Control Techniques for a Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
【2h】

Nonlinear and Fault-tolerant Control Techniques for a Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

机译:四旋翼无人机的非线性容错控制技术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have become more and more popular, and how to control them has become crucial. Although there are many different control methods that can be applied to the control of UAVs, nonlinear control techniques are more practical since the nonlinear features of most UAVs. In this thesis, as the first main contribution, three widely used nonlinear control techniques including Feedback Linearization Control (FLC), Sliding Mode Control (SMC), and Backstepping Control (BSC) are discussed, investigated, and designed in details and flight-tested on a unique quadrotor UAV (Qball-X4) test-bed available at the Networked Autonomous Vehicles (NAV) Lab in Concordia University. Each of these three control algorithms has its own features. The advantages and disadvantages are revealed through both simulation and experimental tests. Sliding mode control is well known for its capability of handling uncertainty, and is expected to be a robust controller on Qball-X4 UAV. Feedback linearization control and backstepping control are considered a bit weaker than sliding mode control. A comparison of these three controllers is carried out in both theoretical analysis and experimental results under same fault-free flight conditions. Testing results and comparison show the different features of different control methods, and provide a view on how to choose controller under a specific condition. Besides, safety and reliability of UAVs have been and will always be a critical issue in the aviation industry. Fault-Tolerant Control (FTC) has played an extremely important role towards UAVs’ safety and reliability and the safety of group people if an unexpected crash occurred due to faults/damages of UAVs. Therefore, FTC has been a very active and quickly growing research and development field for UAVs and other safety-critical systems. Based on the use of sliding mode control technique, referred to as Fault-Tolerant SMC (FT-SMC) have been investigated, implemented, flight-tested and compared in the Qball-X4 test-bed and also simulation environment in both passive and active framework of FTC in the presence of different actuator faults/damages, as the second main contribution of this thesis work.
机译:无人飞行器(UAV)变得越来越流行,如何控制它们也变得至关重要。尽管有许多不同的控制方法可应用于无人机的控制,但是非线性控制技术由于大多数无人机的非线性特性而更加实用。在本文中,作为第一个主要贡献,详细讨论,研究和设计了三种广泛使用的非线性控制技术,包括反馈线性控制(FLC),滑模控制(SMC)和反推控制(BSC)并进行了飞行测试在康科迪亚大学网络无人驾驶汽车(NAV)实验室的独特四旋翼无人机(Qball-X4)试验台上运行。这三种控制算法均具有自己的功能。通过仿真和实验测试可以揭示其优缺点。滑模控制以其处理不确定性的能力而闻名,并有望成为Qball-X4无人机的强大控制器。反馈线性化控制和后推控制被认为比滑模控制要弱一些。在相同的无故障飞行条件下,对这三种控制器的理论分析和实验结果进行了比较。测试结果和比较结果显示了不同控制方法的不同特征,并提供了在特定条件下如何选择控制器的观点。此外,无人机的安全性和可靠性一直是并将永远是航空业的关键问题。容错控制(FTC)对于无人驾驶飞机的故障/损坏导致意外坠毁,对无人机的安全性和可靠性以及人员的安全起着极其重要的作用。因此,FTC已经成为无人机和其他安全关键系统的非常活跃且发展迅速的领域。基于滑模控制技术,在Qball-X4测试台以及被动和主动仿真环境中,对称为容错SMC(FT-SMC)的故障进行了研究,实施,飞行测试和比较存在不同执行器故障/损坏的FTC框架,是本论文工作的第二个主要贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Li Tong;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号