首页> 外文OA文献 >Optimal measures in order to reduce total emissions from non-road mobile machinery in a national and economic perspective
【2h】

Optimal measures in order to reduce total emissions from non-road mobile machinery in a national and economic perspective

机译:从国家和经济角度来看,为减少非道路移动机械的总排放量而采取的最佳措施

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this report future annual emissions amounts of gaseous pollutants, particulate matter (PM10) and noise from the non-road mobile machinery sector in Sweden were estimated. The estimates over future emissions amounts were conducted for each year from 2006 to 2020. Special focus has been taken to the impact of European and national legislations, the age distribution of different types and sizes of machinery and measures to reduce the annual emissions. Besides different measures to reduce emissions, corresponding costs were also estimated. The study comprises fuel consumption and emissions of CO2, carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter (PM), and noise from non-road mobile machinery equipped with diesel engines with a rated engine power of 37 to 560 kW. Non-road mobile machinery for example includes tractors, wheel loaders, excavators, articulate haulers, mobile cranes, combined harvesters, forestry machinery and trucks. The current report was a supplementary study to a report describing a methodology for estimating annual fuel consumption and emissions from the non-road mobile machinery sector in Sweden for year 2006. Inventory data of the year 2006 study was obtained from the Swedish machinery testing institute’s machinery inspection operation, statistics of sale returns from trade organisations and the Swedish motor-vehicle register. The number of machinery and annual fuel consumption and emissions amounts for year 2006 is presented in table S1. Besides estimates of annual fuel consumption and emissions amounts, emissions of noise was also derived both at a national level and for a specific construction site. For the case study the results showed that it was possible to reduce the average noise level with more than 3 dB(A) compared with the base scenario just by choosing the machinery fulfilling the strictest noise limits, i.e. Stage II which was mandatory for most machinery from 2006. Other measures simulated included various types of retrofit of noise reduction packages. The specific cost for the different measures to reduce average noise emissions from the specific construction site varied from 4 000 up to more than 500 000 SEK dB-1. For the estimate of future fuel consumption and emissions amounts various simulations were conducted, each with a different measure for reducing the annual amounts. Five main emission reduction measures or programs were studied: - Scrappage program - Alternative fuel program - Voluntary emission regulation program - Retrofit of aftertreatment program - Noise reduction program The impact on engine exhaust gas emissions and noise of the current European emission and noise regulations, Stage I to IV and Stage I to II for emissions and noise respectively were common for all simulations or programs. Besides the impact of European regulations, annual work was set to a fixed value for each type of machinery and year simulated, thus eliminating any potential changes of the state of the market. The result of the baseline scenario "Business as usual" (BAU), i.e. only taking account to the impact of European regulation, is presented in table S2 for four different years Both fuel consumption and emissions of CO2 remains fairly constant as an effect of the assumption that the annual work was set at a fixed value. However, emissions of especially NOx and PM showed a major reduction due to the tighter and tighter regulations. All programs simulated were able to reduce the emissions compared with the BAU scenario with exceptions for emissions of nitrogen oxides, which increased in some of the alternative fuel programs. Both the absolute reduction and cost varied significantly between and within the various programs. Reduction of NOx varied from an accumulated increase in emissions of 25 000 tonne to an accumulated reduction of 22 000 tonne for the studied period from 2006 to 2020. At the same time the accumulated cost for the programs varied from a few hundred million SEK to more than 60 000 million SEK. In table S3, specific reduction cost for each pollutant in SEK kg-1 for eight typical emission reduction programs are presented. The results showed that the most economically favourable alternative for reducing emissions from non-road mobile machinery was the voluntary emissions regulation program, i.e. early introduction of machinery fulfilling coming emission limits. Another important result was that the introduction of alternative fuels as a mean of emissions reduction was associated with rather high costs compared to the actual reduction in emissions. For emissions of nitrogen oxides the specific reduction cost varied from almost 100 SEK kg-1 up to a few hundreds of SEK kg-1 except for the alternative fuel programs, which resulted in a considerable higher cost.
机译:在此报告中,估算了瑞典非道路移动机械行业每年的气态污染物,颗粒物(PM10)和噪声的年度排放量。从2006年至2020年,每年对未来排放量进行估算。特别关注了欧洲和国家法规的影响,不同类型和大小的机械的使用年限以及减少年度排放的措施。除了减少排放的不同措施外,还估算了相应的成本。该研究包括燃料消耗和二氧化碳,一氧化碳(CO),碳氢化合物(HC),氮氧化物(NOx),颗粒物(PM)的排放以及配备有额定发动机功率的柴油发动机的非道路移动机械的噪音37至560 kW。非道路移动机械例如包括拖拉机,轮式装载机,挖掘机,铰接式卡车,移动式起重机,联合收割机,林业机械和卡车。本报告是对报告的补充研究,该报告描述了估算瑞典2006年非道路移动机械部门年度燃料消耗和排放的方法。2006年研究的清单数据来自瑞典机械测试研究所的机械检查操作,贸易组织的销售退货统计数据和瑞典机动车登记册。表S1列出了2006年的机械数量以及年度燃料消耗和排放量。除了估算年度燃料消耗量和排放量之外,还在国家一级和特定建筑工地获得了噪声排放。对于案例研究,结果表明,与基本情况相比,仅通过选择满足最严格噪声限制的机械即可将平均噪声水平降低3 dB(A)以上,即对于大多数机械而言,第二阶段是强制性的从2006年开始实施。其他模拟措施包括各种类型的降噪包改造。降低特定建筑工地平均噪声排放的不同措施的具体成本从4000到50万SEK dB-1以上不等。为了估算未来的燃料消耗和排放量,进行了各种模拟,每种模拟都有不同的措施来减少年度排放量。研究了五个主要的减排措施或计划:-报废计划-替代燃料计划-自愿排放法规计划-后处理计划的改造-降噪计划当前欧洲排放和噪声法规对发动机废气排放和噪声的影响,阶段在所有模拟或程序中,排放和噪声的第一至第四阶段和第一至第二阶段都是常见的。除了欧洲法规的影响外,每种机器的年度工作量和固定的模拟年份也都设置为固定值,从而消除了市场状况的任何潜在变化。在表S2中列出了四个不同年份的基准情景“一切照旧”(BAU)的结果,即仅考虑了欧洲法规的影响。燃料消耗和CO2排放由于假设年度工作被定为固定值。但是,由于法规越来越严格,尤其是NOx和PM的排放量显着减少。与BAU情景相比,所有模拟程序都能够减少排放,但氮氧化物的排放量除外,氮氧化物的排放量在某些替代燃料计划中有所增加。在各个计划之间以及之内,绝对减少额和成本都有很大差异。从2006年至2020年的研究期间,NOx的减少量从累积的2.5万吨的排放增加到累积的2.2万吨的减少而变化。与此同时,这些计划的累积成本从几亿瑞典克朗变化到更多。超过600亿瑞典克朗。在表S3中,列出了八种典型的减排计划中每种污染物的单位SEK kg-1的特定减排成本。结果表明,减少非道路移动机械排放的最经济的替代方案是自愿排放监管计划,即尽早引入满足即将到来的排放限值的机械。另一个重要结果是,采用替代燃料作为减排的手段,与实际减排相比,成本相当高。对于氮氧化物的排放,除替代燃料计划外,特定的减排成本从近100 SEK kg-1到数百SEK kg-1不等,这导致了更高的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号