首页> 外文OA文献 >Green improved processes to extract bioactive phenolic compounds from brown macroalgae using Sargassum muticum as model
【2h】

Green improved processes to extract bioactive phenolic compounds from brown macroalgae using Sargassum muticum as model

机译:以鼠尾草为模型,改进了从褐藻中提取生物活性酚类化合物的绿色工艺

摘要

A comparative study between “alternative” extraction processes such as centrifugal partition extraction (CPE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and classical solid/liquid used in the laboratory are currently focusing on the efficiency (selectivity and productivity) to obtain bioactive phenolic compounds from the phaeophyte Sargassum muticum model. The choice of the best process was based on several measurements: (i) the total phenolic content measured by the colorimetric Folin–Ciocalteu assay, (ii) radical scavenger and antioxidant activities assessed by the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging assay, and the β-carotene bleaching method and finally (iii) the method productivity. Irrespective of the solvent used in the processes, alternative methods are always sharply more effective than classical ones. With the exception of SFE which does not allow extracting the totality of the active phenolic compounds, two of the other extraction methods were particularly promising. First, CPE afforded the most important yields in concentrated phenolic compounds (PC) (22.90±0.65%DW) also displaying the best activities (0.52±0.02 and 0.58±0.19 mg/mL for IC50 and AAC700, respectively). Secondly, PLE using an EtOH:water mixture 75:25 (v/v) allowed a good PC extraction (10.18±0.25%DW) with huge efficiency. Despite a lesser activity of the extracts (0.77±0.01 and 1.59±0.15 mg/mL for IC50 and AAC700, respectively) PLE is a green process and potentially complies European norms requirements for the prospective valorization of phenolic compounds from S. muticum in Brittany.
机译:实验室中使用的“替代”提取工艺(例如离心分配萃取(CPE),超临界流体萃取(SFE)和加压液体萃取(PLE))与经典固/液之间的比较研究目前侧重于效率(选择性和生产率) ),从自生植物Sargassum muticum模型中获得具有生物活性的酚类化合物。最佳工艺的选择基于以下几种测量方法:(i)通过比色Folin-Ciocalteu分析测得的总酚含量,(ii)通过DPPH(2,2-二苯基-1-picllhydrazyl)评估的自由基清除剂和抗氧化活性)自由基清除法,β-胡萝卜素漂白法,以及(iii)方法的产率。无论工艺中使用的溶剂如何,替代方法总是比传统方法更有效。除了不允许提取全部活性酚类化合物的SFE外,其他两种提取方法特别有前途。首先,CPE在浓缩的酚类化合物(PC)中提供了最重要的收率(22.90±0.65%DW),也显示出最佳的活性(IC50和AAC700分别为0.52±0.02和0.58±0.19 mg / mL)。其次,使用EtOH:水比例为75:25(v / v)的PLE可以高效萃取良好的PC(10.18±0.25%DW)。尽管提取物的活性较低(IC50和AAC700的提取物活性分别为0.77±0.01和1.59±0.15 mg / mL),但PLE是绿色工艺,并且可能符合欧洲规范对布列塔尼产的粘液链球菌中酚类化合物的潜在价值进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号