Objective. Stair-riser banners are twice as effective as posters in encouraging stair climbing in shopping centres. This study tested theeffectiveness of stair-riser banners in an English train station in 2006–2007.Method. The train station had a 39-step staircase and an adjacent escalator. Baseline observations (3.5 weeks) were followed by 10.5 weeks of abanner intervention supplemented with 3 weeks of a poster intervention. Both poster and banner featured the message ‘Stair climbing burns morecalories per minute than jogging. Take the stairs’. Ascending escalator and stair users (N=36,239) were coded for gender.Results. Analyses, controlling for effects of gender and pedestrian traffic volume, revealed no significant change in stair climbing betweenbaseline (40.6%) and the banner intervention (40.9%; p=0.98). Addition of the poster increased stair climbing (44.3%; OR=1.36, 95% CIs 1.16–1.60, pb0.001), with the effect reduced at higher pedestrian traffic volumes.Conclusion. While stair-riser banners had no effect, the poster intervention increased stair climbing. The high pedestrian volumes as the waveof disembarking passengers seek to leave the station would have obscured the visibility of the banner for many commuters. Thus stair-riserbanners appear unsuitable point-of-choice prompts in stations where pedestrian traffic volume is high.
展开▼
机译:目的。楼梯横幅在鼓励购物中心爬楼梯方面是海报的两倍。这项研究测试了2006年至2007年间英语火车站的楼梯扶手横幅的有效性。火车站有一个39阶楼梯和一个相邻的自动扶梯。基线观察(3.5周)后,先进行10.5周的abanner干预,再加上3周的海报干预。海报和横幅广告都标有以下信息:“爬楼梯每分钟消耗的卡路里比慢跑多。走楼梯。上升的自动扶梯和楼梯使用者(N = 36,239)进行了性别编码。控制性别和行人流量的影响的分析表明,基线(40.6%)和横幅广告干预(40.9%; p = 0.98)之间的楼梯爬升没有明显变化。张贴海报的人增加了爬楼梯的能力(44.3%; OR = 1.36,95%CI 1.16-1.60,pb0.001),在人流量较高时效果降低。尽管台阶式标语没有效果,但张贴者的干预增加了台阶式攀登。由于上下班旅客试图离开车站而导致的高行人通行量,将使许多通勤者看不到横幅的可见性。因此,在行人流量大的车站中,楼梯上升者出现不合适的选择点提示。
展开▼