首页> 外文OA文献 >Analysis of Third- and Fifth-Grade Spelling Errors on the Test of Written Spelling-4: Do Error Types Indicate Levels of Linguistic Knowledge?
【2h】

Analysis of Third- and Fifth-Grade Spelling Errors on the Test of Written Spelling-4: Do Error Types Indicate Levels of Linguistic Knowledge?

机译:在书面拼写4测试中分析三级和五级拼写错误:错误类型是否表示语言知识的水平?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A standardized test of spelling ability, Test of Written Spelling ? 4, was used to explore the error patterns of Grade 3 and Grade 5 students in public and private schools in the southwestern region of the US. The study was for the purpose of examining the relationship between types of errors students make within a grade level (Grades 3 & 5 for this study), and the students? spelling proficiency. A qualitative analysis of errors on the Test of Written Spelling ? 4 (TWS-4) resulted in distributions of errors categorized as phonological, phonetic, orthographic, etymological, and morphological. For both Grades 3 and 5, a higher proportion of phonological and phonetic errors were made by students in the lowest spelling achievement group. Students with higher standard spelling scores made a lower proportion of phonological and phonetic errors and a higher proportion of errors categorized as etymological and morphological. The Test of Silent Word Reading Fluency (TOSWRF; Mather, Allen, Hammill, & Roberts, 2004) was also administered to the students to examine the relationship of these error types to literacy. The correlation between reading fluency standard scores and phonological and phonetic errors was negative, whereas the correlation between reading fluency and orthographic, etymological, and morphological error types was positive. This study underscores the value of looking at spelling achievement as a part of students? literacy profiles. In addition, the study highlights the importance of making sure students beyond the years of very early reading and spelling development (Grades 3-5), especially those with low spelling proficiency, have the basic skills of phonological awareness and basic sound/symbol correspondences in place to support their ability to spell and to read, and that spelling must be taught in such a way as to meet students? individual student needs.
机译:拼写能力的标准测试,即书面拼写测试?使用图4来研究美国西南地区公立和私立学校3年级和5年级学生的错误模式。这项研究的目的是检查学生在年级(本研究的3年级和5年级)内犯的错误类型与学生之间的关系。拼写能力。书面拼写测试错误的定性分析。图4(TWS-4)导致错误的分布,这些错误分为语音,语音,正字,词源和形态。对于3年级和5年级,拼写成绩最低的学生中,语音和语音错误的比例更高。具有较高标准拼写分数的学生在语音和语音错误中所占的比例较低,而在归类为词源和形态方面的错误中所占比例较高。还对学生进行了无声单词阅读流利度测试(TOSWRF; Mather,Allen,Hammill和Roberts,2004),以检查这些错误类型与读写能力之间的关系。阅读流利度标准分数与语音和语音错误之间的相关为负,而阅读流利度与正字,词源和形态错误类型之间的相关为正。这项研究强调了将拼写成绩视为学生的一部分的价值吗?素养概况。此外,研究还强调了确保学生在早期阅读和拼写发展(3-5年级)以外的岁月,尤其是那些拼写能力较弱的学生,具有基本的语音意识和基本的声音/符号对应能力的重要性。是支持他们的拼写和阅读能力的地方,并且必须以与学生见面的方式来教授拼写吗?个别学生的需求。

著录项

  • 作者

    Conway Barbara Tenney;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号