首页> 外文OA文献 >Measuring Mindfulness in Meditators, and Examining How Aspects of Meditation Practice Affect Mindfulness
【2h】

Measuring Mindfulness in Meditators, and Examining How Aspects of Meditation Practice Affect Mindfulness

机译:测量冥想者的正念,并研究冥想练习如何影响正念

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Mindfulness is an element of consciousness which has historically been associated with well-being. Mindfulness-based clinical interventions intend on reducing cognitive vulnerability to emotional distress and have produced promising results. Such endeavors however rest upon the dissent that remains among researchers on how to operationally define the construct. Measuring mindfulness in a valid and reliable manner is an essential part of scientific inquiry and facilitates the effort to define the construct. This study examines three newer self-report mindfulness instruments; Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS) and the Experiences Questionnaire (EQ). A sample of non-meditators (Texas A&M University students; n =141) and meditators (non-clinical population from Bay Area, California; n =157) with a wide range of meditation experience completed the instruments. Multiple correlations allowed for an in-depth examination of the measures at full-scale and sub-scale level and all yielded significant and positive relations. Regression analyses established that meditation does increase mindfulness scores as measured by the FFMQ, TMS and EQ. Sub-scales FFMQ Observe, FFMQ Non React and TMS Decenter increased most of the combined eight facets; while FFMQ Describe and FFMQ Aware increased least. Lastly, the study examined how various aspects of meditation practice affect total mindfulness. Aspects of practice included: Number of sittings per week (sit/wk); time spent per meditation sitting (time/med); how long the participant has engaged in formal meditation (how long) and style of meditation (style). Meditation styles were grouped into the following categories; 1) Mindfulness, Vipassana, Zen and Shambhala; 2) Concentration and Transcendental; 3) Blend and 4) ?I don?t know?. ?Sit/wk?, ?how long? and ?style? were predictive of total mindfulness, with ?how long? being the strongest predictor. All the mindfulness facets were predicted by meditation style except for FFMQ Observe, FFMQ Describe and TMS Curiosity. Meditation styles mindfulness, Vipassana, Zen and Shambhala were associated with the highest mindfulness scores.
机译:正念是自古以来就与幸福相关的意识要素。基于正念的临床干预旨在减少对情绪困扰的认知脆弱性,并产生了可喜的结果。然而,这种努力取决于研究人员在如何操作性定义结构方面的分歧。以有效和可靠的方式测量正念是科学探究的重要组成部分,有助于定义结构。这项研究研究了三种更新的自我报告正念工具;五方面正念问卷(FFMQ),多伦多正念量表(TMS)和体验问卷(EQ)。具有广泛冥想经验的非冥想者(德克萨斯州农工大学学生; n = 141)和冥想者(来自加利福尼亚湾区的非临床人群; n = 157)的样本构成了该仪器。多重相关性允许在全面和次规模水平上对措施进行深入检查,并且都产生了显着的积极关系。回归分析确定,冥想确实增加了按FFMQ,TMS和EQ衡量的正念得分。分量表FFMQ观察,FFMQ Non React和TMS Decenter增加了这八个方面中的大多数。而FFMQ Describe和FFMQ Aware增长最少。最后,该研究检查了冥想练习的各个方面如何影响整体正念。实践方面包括:每周的开会次数(周/周);每次静坐所花费的时间(时间/时间);参与者从事正式冥想的时间(多长时间)和冥想的方式(风格)。冥想风格分为以下几类: 1)正念,内观,禅宗和香巴拉; 2)专心和超然; 3)Blend和4)“我不知道吗?”。 “坐/周”,?多长时间?和?样式?能预测整体正念,持续多长时间?是最强的预测指标。除FFMQ观察,FFMQ描述和TMS好奇心外,所有正念面均通过冥想方式进行预测。冥想风格的正念,内观,禅和香巴拉与最高的正念得分相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号