首页> 外文OA文献 >Critical-Thinking Skills of First-Year Athletic Training Students Enrolled in Professional Programs
【2h】

Critical-Thinking Skills of First-Year Athletic Training Students Enrolled in Professional Programs

机译:一年级运动训练学生参加专业计划的关键思维技巧

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Context: The Examination of Professional Degree Level document presented to the National Athletic Trainers’ Association Board of Directors states that research in athletic training education has not investigated differences in the critical-thinking skills of professional athletic training students.Objective: Investigate the differences in critical thinking and other demographic variables across first-year athletic training students enrolled in professional bachelor’s- and master’s-degree programs.Design: Quantitative study.Setting: District 10 athletic training programs.Patients or Other Participants: Students (N ¼ 40) enrolled within their first 6 months of a professional athletic training program were asked to complete the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST). Twelve first-year master’s-degree students (8 female, 4 male) and 28 bachelor’s-degree students (18 female, 10 male) completed the CCTST (age ¼ 20.73 6 3.09 years).Main Outcome Measure(s): Athletic training students in District 10 were asked to complete the CCTST during the first 6 months of their respective programs. Independent t tests were used to evaluate the difference in critical-thinking scores between professional master’s- and bachelor’s-degree athletic training students. A 1-way analysis of variance was conducted to determine differences in critical-thinking skills with regard to gender, age, and parental educational level.Results: There were no statistically significant differences in critical-thinking skills between bachelor’s- and master’s-degree athletic training students enrolled in a professional athletic training program (P ¼ .991). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in critical-thinking skills with regard to gender (P ¼ .156), age (P ¼ .410), or parental education level (P ¼ .156).Conclusions: The results suggest master’s students do not have greater critical-thinking skills than professional bachelor’s students before engaging in athletic training education. Therefore, as the professional degree of athletic training transitions to the graduate level, athletic training educators may need to investigate and use pedagogical practices that will graduate critically thinking athletic trainers.
机译:背景信息:对全国运动培训师协会董事会的专业学位级别文件的审查表示,运动训练教育的研究没有调查专业运动训练学生的关键思维技能的差异。目的:调查批判性差异思考和其他人口统计变量跨第一岁的运动训练学生参加专业学士学位和硕士学位课程。设计:定量学习。诱缝:第10区运动培训计划。分类或其他参与者:学生(N¼40)纳入其内部要求前6个月的专业运动培训计划完成加州批判性思维技能测试(中央氏菌)。十二个第一年硕士学位学生(8名女性,4只男)和28名学士学位(18名女性,10名男性)完成了CCTST(年龄№20.733 3.09年).Main结果措施:运动培训学生在第10区被要求在各自方案的前6个月内完成中央氏菌。独立的T检验用于评估专业硕士和学士学位运动培训学生之间的关键思维分数的差异。进行了单向方差分析,以确定关于性别,年龄和父母教育水平的关键思维技能的差异。结果:学士学位和硕士学位运动之间的关键思维技能没有统计学意义的差异培训学生注册了专业的运动训练计划(P¼.991)。此外,关于性别(P¼.156),年龄(p¼.410)或父母教育水平(p¼.156)的关键思维技能没有统计学上显着差异.Conclusions:结果表明硕士学位在参与体育训练教育之前,没有比专业的学士学位更大的关键思维技能。因此,随着专业程度的运动培训转型到毕业生水平,运动培训教育者可能需要调查和使用将毕业的教学实践批评思维运动培训师。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号