首页> 外文OA文献 >An expiremental study and modeling on gas metal arc welded lap joint of A7075-T651 aluminium alloy to AZ31B magnesium alloy
【2h】

An expiremental study and modeling on gas metal arc welded lap joint of A7075-T651 aluminium alloy to AZ31B magnesium alloy

机译:A 7075-T651铝合金与AZ31B镁合金的气金属弧焊搭接实验研究与建模

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Innovative welding technique for joining aluminum and magnesium alloys in automobile, aviation, aerospace and marine industries would achieve weight reduction, high specific strength as well as increase fuel efficiency and reduce environmental pollution. However, poor mechanical properties of welding joint between aluminum and magnesium alloys due to the formation of AlmMgn type brittle intermetallic compounds is the main barrier for extensive uses of these two alloys especially in transportation sectors. No exact solution has been established yet for reliable joining while; modeling study in this area is still much lagging. This research work was carried out to conduct experimental study and mathematical modeling of mechanical properties for A7075- T651 aluminum and AZ31B magnesium alloys joints welded by gas metal arc lap welding method. Unconventional ER308L-Si stainless steel and conventional ER5356 aluminum wires were used as filler. Shielding gas used was 98% argon and 2% oxygen. The shielding gas flow rate, tip to work distance, welding current and voltage were the variable parameters. Box-Behnken technique in response surface methodology was used for design of experiments. The welding torch angle, filler wire diameter and parent metal thickness were kept constant. The ultimate tensile strength and fracture toughness of the joints were evaluated. The fracture toughness of the welding joints was calculated from yield strength and absorbed charpy impact energy of the joints using Rolfe-Novak-Barsom correlation. Mathematical models were developed based on regression analysis to relate the responses (ultimate tensile strength and fracture toughness) with welding variable parameters and validation experiments were conducted to verify the models. The significance and effects of variable parameters on the responses were also analyzed. The macro and microstructures at the welding cross section were investigated by optical microscope. The fracture surface morphologies and elements analysis at the welding cross section were carried out by scanning electron microscopy and electron dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The results revealed that more significant mechanical properties were achieved with stainless steel filler compared to aluminum filler. The maximum yield strength, ultimate tensile strength and fracture toughness were 203.09 MPa, 249.33 MPa and 27.49 MPa√m respectively with steel filler; and 176.30 MPa, 226.28 MPa and 20.22 MPa√m respectively with aluminum filler. The analysis of variance showed that a very good fitting and variation with data, high accuracy in predicting the responses have been illustrated by the models for both fillers. The validation tests revealed that the ultimate tensile strength models can predict the responses within 0.21% and 1.81% maximum error, and fracture toughness models can predict the responses within 0.51% and 3.36% maximum error respectively. Most of the joints failed at AZ31B alloy (with steel filler) and ER5356 aluminum nugget (with aluminum filler). The investigation revealed that fracture occurred due to brittle fracture mechanism by formation of micro pores, voids, cracks, MgnOm oxides, very little amount of MgnFem and AlmMgn intermetallic compounds at AZ31B alloy, and due to micro pores, voids, cracks, AlmOn and MgmOn oxides and a good amount of AlmMgn intermetallic compounds at aluminum nugget. There was no evidence of fracture from metallurgical bonding between steel or aluminum nuggets and parent alloy. The output of this research exhibited very significant mechanical properties of the joint that can facilitate the extensive uses of A7075-T651 and AZ31B alloys in mass production of light weight vehicle structures in transportation industries
机译:用于汽车,航空,航天和海洋工业中的铝和镁合金接合的创新焊接技术将实现轻量化,高比强度以及提高燃油效率和减少环境污染的目的。但是,由于形成了AlmMgn型脆性金属间化合物,导致铝和镁合金之间焊接接头的机械性能较差,这是尤其在交通运输领域广泛使用这两种合金的主要障碍。尚无确切的解决方案来建立可靠的连接。在这方面的建模研究仍然很滞后。进行了这项研究工作,以进行通过气体金属电弧搭接焊接法焊接的A7075-T651铝和AZ31B镁合金接头的力学性能的实验研究和数学建模。使用非常规ER308L-Si不锈钢和常规ER5356铝线作为填料。使用的保护气体为98%的氩气和2%的氧气。保护气体流量,焊嘴到工作距离,焊接电流和电压是可变参数。响应面方法中的Box-Behnken技术用于实验设计。焊炬角,焊丝直径和母材厚度保持恒定。评估了接头的极限抗拉强度和断裂韧性。使用Rolfe-Novak-Barsom相关性,根据屈服强度和吸收的夏比冲击能来计算焊接接头的断裂韧性。基于回归分析开发了数学模型,以将响应(最终抗拉强度和断裂韧性)与焊接变量参数相关联,并进行了验证实验以验证模型。还分析了变量参数对响应的意义和影响。用光学显微镜研究了焊接截面的宏观和微观结构。通过扫描电子显微镜和电子弥散X射线光谱法进行了焊接截面的断口形貌和元素分析。结果表明,与铝填料相比,不锈钢填料具有更显着的机械性能。用钢填料的最大屈服强度,极限抗拉强度和断裂韧性分别为203.09 MPa,249.33 MPa和27.49MPa√m。铝填料分别为176.30 MPa,226.28 MPa和20.22MPa√m。方差分析表明,这两种填充物的模型都说明了与数据的很好的拟合和变化,预测响应的高精度。验证测试表明,极限抗拉强度模型可以预测最大误差在0.21%和1.81%之内的响应,而断裂韧性模型可以预测最大误差在0.51%和3.36%之内的响应。大多数接头在AZ31B合金(带钢填料)和ER5356铝块(带铝填料)处失效。研究表明,断裂是由于在AZ31B合金上形成微孔,空隙,裂纹,MgnOm氧化物,极少量的MgnFem和AlmMgn金属间化合物而形成的脆性断裂机理,以及由于微孔,空隙,裂纹,AlmOn和MgmOn引起的。铝块中的氧化物和大量的AlmMgn金属间化合物。没有证据表明钢或铝块与母合金之间的冶金结合会导致断裂。这项研究的结果显示了接头非常重要的机械性能,可以促进A7075-T651和AZ31B合金在交通运输行业轻型车辆结构的批量生产中的广泛使用

著录项

  • 作者

    Md. Rafiqul Islam;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号