首页> 外文OA文献 >Bus arrival time prediction using mixed multi-route arrival time data at previous stop
【2h】

Bus arrival time prediction using mixed multi-route arrival time data at previous stop

机译:使用以前停止使用混合多路径到达时间数据的总线到达时间预测

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The primary objective of this paper is to develop models to predict bus arrival time at a target stop using actual multi-route bus arrival time data from previous stop as inputs. In order to mix and fully utilize the multiple routes bus arrival time data, the weighted average travel time and three Forgetting Factor Functions (FFFs) – F1, F2 and F3 – are introduced. Based on different combinations of input variables, five prediction models are proposed. Three widely used algorithms, i.e. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neutral Network (ANN) and Linear Regression (LR), are tested to find the best for arrival time prediction. Bus location data of 11 road segments from Yichun (China), covering 12 bus stops and 16 routes, are collected to evaluate the performance of the proposed approaches. The results show that the newly introduced parameters, the weighted average travel time, can significantly improve the prediction accuracy: the prediction errors reduce by around 20%. The algorithm comparison demonstrates that the SVM and ANN outperform the LR. The FFFs can also affect the performance errors: F1 is more suitable for ANN algorithm, while F3 is better for SVM and LR algorithms. Besides, the virtual road concept in this paper can slightly improve the prediction accuracy and halve the time cost of predicted arrival time calculation.First published online 02 May 2017
机译:本文的主要目标是开发模型使用来自前一站作为输入的实际多路由总线到达时间数据在目标停止预测总线到达时间。为了混合和充分利用多条路线公共汽车到达时间数据,加权平均旅行时间和三个遗忘因子的功能(FFFs) - F1,F2和F3 - 进行了介绍。基于输入变量的不同组合,五个预测模型提出了建议。的三种广泛使用的算法,即支持向量机(SVM),人工神经网络(ANN)和线性回归(LR),进行测试,以找到最好的到达时间预测。从伊春(中国)11个路段,占地12个公交车站和16路公交位置数据被收集为评价所提出的方法的性能。结果表明,新引进的参数,加权平均出行时间,可以显著提高预测精度:预测误差减少了20%左右。该算法比较表明,SVM和ANN优于LR。该FFFs也会影响性能的错误:F1更适合ANN的算法,而F3是更好地为SVM和LR算法。此外,本文中的虚拟道路的概念可以稍微提高预测精度和预测减半到达时间计算的时间成本。首先2017年五月在线02发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号