首页> 外文OA文献 >Is perception of safety climate a relevant predictor for occupational accidents? Prospective cohort study among blue-collar workers
【2h】

Is perception of safety climate a relevant predictor for occupational accidents? Prospective cohort study among blue-collar workers

机译:对职业事故的相关预测因素是对安全气氛的看法吗?蓝领工人前瞻性队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The capability of safety climate to predict accidents has been the target of widespread debate in occupational health and safety research. The objective of this prospective cohort study was to employ a shortened five-item safety climate survey to investigate whether safety climate reports in 2012 are predictive for accidents reported within the last 12 months in 2014. METHODS: In both 2012 and 2014, 3864 blue-collar workers answered the Danish Working Environment and Health Cohort Study. Logistic regression was used to study the association [odds ratio (OR)] of reporting a work-related accident (yes/no) with more than one day of sickness absence (outcome) within the last 12 months in 2014 with the number of safety climate problems (predictor). The analyses were cumulatively adjusted for age, gender (model 1), socioeconomic class, occupational group, lifestyle (model 2), and previous accidents in 2012 (model 3). RESULTS: Of the safety climate problems reported in 2012, 1017 (28%) participants reported one problem, 357 (10%) reported two and 614 (17%) reported three or more problems. Using the number of safety climate problems as a continuous variable, all models showed a dose–response relationship between number of safety climate problems in 2012 and at least one accident in 2014 (trend-test, P<0.001). Compared to participants with no safety climate problems, participants reporting two safety climate problems in 2012 had a higher risk for reporting an accident in 2014 [OR 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22–2.77], and the risk was higher for participants reporting three or more safety problems (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.60–3.09). CONCLUSIONS: A higher number of safety climate problems progressively increased the OR for reporting at least one accident within the last 12 months at the two-year follow-up. The five-item safety climate survey is a simple and important tool that can be used as part of risk assessment in blue-collar workplaces.
机译:目标:安全气候能够预测事故的能力一直是职业健康和安全研究中普遍争论的目标。该潜在队列研究的目的是雇用缩短的五件安全气候调查,以调查2012年的安全气候报告是否是2014年过去12个月内报告的事故的预测。方法:在2012年和2014年,3864年的蓝色 - 领工人回答了丹麦工作环境和健康队列研究。 Logistic回归用于研究在2014年过去12个月内报告与疾病缺席(结果)在2014年的疾病缺席(结果)中报告有关的事故(是/否)的协会[odds比率]]气候问题(预测因素)。分析累积为年龄,性别(模型1),社会经济阶层,职业集团,生活方式(模型2)和2012年以前的事故(型号3)。结果:2012年报告的安全气候问题,1017(28%)参与者报告了一个问题,357名(10%)报告了2和614(17%)报告了三个或更多问题。使用安全气候问题的数量作为连续变量,所有模型在2012年的安全气候问题数量与2014年至少一次事故之间显示了一种剂量 - 反应关系(趋势试验,P <0.001)。与参与者没有安全气候问题,2012年报告两次安全气候问题的参与者在2014年报告事故的风险更高[或1.84,95%置信区间(CI)1.22-2.77],参与者的风险更高报告三个或更多的安全问题(或2.22,95%CI 1.60-3.09)。结论:在两年的随访期间,逐步增加了较高的安全气候问题或在过去12个月内报告至少一次事故。五项安全气候调查是一种简单而重要的工具,可作为蓝领工作场所的风险评估的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号